If Vreeland's information is reliable, we might have a handle on why the United States is threatening Russia with nuclear strikes. Like a trapped animal the U.S. realizes the mistake it has made. Disarming after our alleged Cold War victory was an error. Now the U.S. must make terrible threats and take drastic action to restore the nuclear balance.
Is the contradiction here not evident? We are holding Russia responsible (hostage) for Iraq's actions by threatening a nuclear attack on Russia, yet, Russia has this secret technology to disarm our nuclear weapons and blind our Global Positioning Satellite to prevent us from atttacking them. Some threat! Try again, Nyquist.
If Vreeland's information is reliable, we might have a handle on why the United States is threatening Russia with nuclear strikes. Like a trapped animal the U.S. realizes the mistake it has made. Disarming after our alleged Cold War victory was an error. Now the U.S. must make terrible threats and take drastic action to restore the nuclear balance.
Is the contradiction here not evident? We are holding Russia responsible (hostage) for Iraq's actions by threatening a nuclear attack on Russia, yet, Russia has this secret technology to disarm our nuclear weapons and blind our Global Positioning Satellite to prevent us from atttacking them. Some threat! Try again, Nyquist.
It's called the wilderness of mirrors. One claim is made, the other is countered. You siding with either claim puts you on the wrong side. Nyquist is not siding, he is making a counter hypothesis to what we are fed daily.