To: Pokey78
Andrew Sullivan holds Michael Moore up to scorn, as a ridiculous talisman of the left.
Meanwhile, back at the NYTimes, Frank Rich offers a column that holds up Moore up as a paragon worth emulating.
The Wimps of War
Together, the two pieces offer a simply stunning opportunity for "compare and contrast"...
9 posted on
03/30/2002 6:21:33 PM PST by
okie01
To: okie01
Andrew Sullivan holds Michael Moore up to scorn, as a ridiculous talisman of the left. There's always Alec the bloviator Baldwin. The funny thing about Baldwin is he actually believes himself when he is sounding off and frothing at the mouth about his goofy Republican hate venting.
12 posted on
03/30/2002 6:27:19 PM PST by
doosee
To: okie01
Together, the two pieces offer a simply stunning opportunity for "compare and contrast"... lol- Got that right.
Sullivan-- Moore is a paranoid, subliterate cynical bitter-monger who hates successful white people, car owners, the work ethic and, quite simply, America in general
Rich-- Moore is a "best-selling populist."
An oldie from Salon
To: okie01;Pokey78
Another winner by Andrew. I saw Moore on O'Reilly recently, and he just spews venom. He told O'Reilly that the gov't should be taking 70% tax from the rich. I wonder if he really and truly believes that stuff he spouts. What a maroon.
Okie, thanks for the link to Rich's essay. He is another blowhard. Had some very interesting observations about the weeny Rats - and still managed to get in the requisite slaps at President Bush.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson