Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/01/2002 3:45:34 PM PST by irksome1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: irksome1
....sure, make the modest one's look like the odd balls!
2 posted on 04/01/2002 3:55:33 PM PST by GrandMoM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: irksome1
If there really a problem here (which I rather doubt), it would make a lot more sense to insist on a restroom monitor being present, to ensure that nothing is going on in the restrooms which would make it apparent who is gay and who isn't. This would also eliminate smoking, illegal drug use, and bullying/physical assaults in the restrooms.
3 posted on 04/01/2002 4:06:19 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: irksome1
But he said what Scott wants – separate restrooms and locker rooms for students and staff who are or are perceived to be gay or lesbian – would be illegal.

BUT - if the gay/lesbian students "demanded" their own facilities, how many heartbeats would it take before the school board caved and gave it to them? All in the name of "diversity" and "tolerance", of course.
5 posted on 04/01/2002 4:17:18 PM PST by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: irksome1
We sure are going to need a lot of new restrooms. We'll have to have STRAIGHT MEN, STRAIGHT WOMEN, GAY MEN, GAY WOMEN, BISEXUAL MEN, BISEXUAL WOMEN, TRANGENDER MEN, TRANSGENDER WOMEN, TRANSGENDER MEN WHO STILL LIKE MEN, TRANSGENDER WOMEN WHO STILL LIKE WOMEN, (I swear I saw something like that on Jerry Springer--a woman who became a man but still wanted to have sex with men, or, maybe it was a man who became a woman but still wanted to have sex with women. I think.)
6 posted on 04/01/2002 4:27:07 PM PST by TruthShallSetYouFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: irksome1
Yeah, and this isn't fair or equitable for us hetrosexual, non-deviants. Why should the faggots and lesbos be able to shower with the objects of their lust and not us? That isn't fair!! Hell, it is discriminatory!!
8 posted on 04/01/2002 4:55:44 PM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: irksome1
If you suck from the government teat,
you get government milk.

Alliance for the Separation of School and State

9 posted on 04/01/2002 4:57:00 PM PST by toenail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: irksome1
I large company I worked for had a strong pro-gay support/ recruiting structure. It bothered me that in this environment there were no modesty screens between urinals.

One day it was discovered that a maintenance person had found a way to the ceiling above a woman's restroom and was voyeuring (is there such a word?) on the occupants. A division meeting was called to calm the concerns of the users promising a thorough investigation and prosecution of the bad guy. Counseling was offered, etc, etc.

I was tempted to suggest that the perpetrator may have merely been a lesbian trapped in a man's body and therefore created no reason for concern.

10 posted on 04/01/2002 5:01:38 PM PST by Z.Hobbs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: irksome1
What an interesting story. They won't allow straight boys, who are attracted to girls, in the girl's bathrooms but they'll allow lesbians with the same attractions....... Not certain if this daughter/family has a true problem with the lesbians or are they making a statement/point? And a great point "NatureGirl"...the GLBT groups get schools to jump when they cry discrimination....
13 posted on 04/01/2002 5:59:33 PM PST by my4kidsdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson