Replies

You are right; I did NOT answer your question. I have no intention of answering it. I do not think it should be answered. We are ALL capable of sin, we ALL fall short of God's standard of righteousness. We are ALL deserving of hell.

I also disagree with your premise that God only works with those who want to be changed. He, many times, works outside of our wishes but always in accord with His lovingkindness.

It's time to withdraw from the UN and NATO and all the other WORLD GOVERNMENT institutions.

It's time to remember George Washington's warning:

It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world, so far, I mean, as we are now at liberty to do it, for let me not be understood as capable of patronizing infidelity to existing engagements. I hold the maxim no less applicable to public than to private affairs that honesty is always the best policy. I repeat, therefore, let those engagements be observed in their genuine sense. But in my opinion it is unnecessary and would be unwise to extend them.

Taking care always to keep ourselves by suitable establishments on a respectable defensive posture, we may safely trust to temporary alliances for extraordinary emergencies.

And we should stop giving taxpayer money to foreigners.

A new world environment organization and an international environmental court would help make sense of the more than 500 environmental agreements and agencies now operating around the globe, researchers said recently.

Oh no! Another one!

In addition, problems like global warming and pollution simply transcend national interests, they said.

This sounds like "give up your brains and your rights, I have a better plan for you". "I know better how you unknowingly hate your neighbor." Because they say so, they define themselves as an authority, and note that they did not define the environment as an authority but as a pretext for authority of a cult seeking to violate separation of powers and legal jurisprudence.

The environment is not the interest, people's and nations' jurisdictions are what transcend the environment since nature is naturaly hostile and savage but observable and controlabe by us. Doctors and environmentalists are supposed to fix a material problem, not a jurisdictional one. In fact, environmentalists should be worried about protecting man from nature than protecting nature from man. That is their job. Protecting man from man is not their job.

If there was any international cooperation that could transcend national interest, it is the one against terrorism, or, rather, against violent terrorist cult nations or international groups that seek to protect nature from man instead of man from nature or man from evil people and evil cults.