Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poohbah
Why not develop a new type of 16" gun that won't use bagged powder, and put it on a hull of Chobham armor?

It's almost a direct upgrade - all we really are doing is scaling up what we did with the 8" guns on the Salem-class cruisers.

43 posted on 04/03/2002 11:15:41 AM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: hchutch
Why not develop a new type of 16" gun that won't use bagged powder, and put it on a hull of Chobham armor?

Ah, a brand-new gun, using 1945 vintage technology!

Why not use the latest technology, since the R&D time will be the same either way?

It's almost a direct upgrade - all we really are doing is scaling up what we did with the 8" guns on the Salem-class cruisers.

Given the turret explosion on the USS Newport News in 1972, the problems don't magically vanish. You'll take at least as long, if not longer, for the gun and turret design as you would for an all-new rail or coilgun with much more capability.

44 posted on 04/03/2002 11:21:30 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson