The reference to the fourth amendment is interesting. It's something that's been rattling around in my brain for a long time: Does it not violate the 4th to have inspections for various types of health and safety codes, such as a building inspection whenever someone wants to sell his house? It seems like challenging it would open up a whole new can o' worms, and yet, I can't see exactly how to justify these practices.
Does it not violate the 4th to have inspections for various types of health and safety codes, such as a building inspection whenever someone wants to sell his house? I believe one can refuse to admit the property assessor on such grounds, but then if one appeals the valuation, the only way to get your appeal heard may be to submit to such inspection.
As regards to inspections related to the exchange of real estate, since borrowed money is usually involved, the lender may make them a requirement for the mortgage. However between two willing parties and particularly without 3rd party government ( FHA, etc. ) financing, it seems the governments have no legitimate role in placing conditions on the sale.