Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dukie
Yes, you're right. It protects against judicial and executive action - the judicial from issuing warrants for the wrong reason, and the executive from arbitrarily searching without warrants at all, or at least without probable cause, in cases where there's no time to consult a judge.

But my point is that when the executive branch is carrying out acts of legislation - such as tax inspection - it may not violate the "unreasonable search" standard, as the founders intended it to mean.

70 posted on 04/03/2002 10:30:45 AM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: inquest
Good morning inquest.

As we saw in the questions surrounding the matter of trunk searches during traffic stops, the issue of reasonable versus unreasonable becomes a matter for the judiciary. We have to be vigilant in the protection of rights.

73 posted on 04/04/2002 5:48:54 AM PST by Dukie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson