[stainlessbanner]

You have to present your argument better than quoting the Constitution and saying you disagree with DiLorenzo and Williams. You fail to support the reasons why the men in dispute are wrong. Not a convincing argument!

[r9etb]

You have to present your argument better than quoting the Constitution and saying you disagree with DiLorenzo and Williams. You fail to support the reasons why the men in dispute are wrong. Not a convincing argument!

Why? If Williams says that secession was legal, and that Lincoln was wrong in trying to stop it; and the Constitution flatly contradicts him -- what other argument need be made?