Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: r9etb
The secessionist states clearly violated almost every part of Section 10 -- especially that last clause

But if a state has seceded then it's no longer subject to any restrictions in the Constitution, since it is no longer a party to it.

Also, what about Article VII: The ratification of the conventions of nine states, shall be sufficient for the establishment of this Constitution between the states so ratifying the same.

Clearly no state could be forced to be part of the Union without its express consent. By giving consent to enter the Union, a state is supposed to forever surrender it's ability to withdraw its consent?

43 posted on 04/03/2002 10:52:13 AM PST by freedomcrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: freedomcrusader
Clearly no state could be forced to be part of the Union without its express consent. By giving consent to enter the Union, a state is supposed to forever surrender it's ability to withdraw its consent?

You have to remember that the Articles of Confederation were a total failure. Something more pervasive was needed, as George Washington said. The Constitution does have a conflict resolution mechanism; it can be amended.

But you are correct. There is no legal way out of the Union without the consent of the other states.

Walt

50 posted on 04/03/2002 11:07:36 AM PST by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: freedomcrusader
But if a state has seceded then it's no longer subject to any restrictions in the Constitution, since it is no longer a party to it.

That's a moot point. We're talking about the legality of the act of secession, not necessarily the legality of what they do after they illegaly seceed. If I stand on a street corner and announce I am now a citizen of the Republic of Me, that doesn't mean I can go rob a bank and escape punishment. I didn't properly annul my citizenship to begin with, so the laws of the United States still apply to me.

Also, what about Article VII: The ratification of the conventions of nine states, shall be sufficient for the establishment of this Constitution between the states so ratifying the same.
Clearly no state could be forced to be part of the Union without its express consent. By giving consent to enter the Union, a state is supposed to forever surrender it's ability to withdraw its consent?


Yes. It's in the contract. Check out Article I in The Senate resolution to annex Hawaii:

"The Republic of Hawaii hereby cedes absolutely and without reserve to the United States of America all rights of sovereignty of whatsoever kind in and over the Hawaiian Islands and their dependencies: and it is agreed that all the territory of and appertaining to the agreed that all the territory of and appertaining to the Republic of Hawaii is hereby annexed to the United States of America under the name of the Territory of Hawaii." You'll find that other annexation resolutions have very similar language. Moral of the story: don't sign annexation resolutions if you're just fooling around.
56 posted on 04/03/2002 11:10:34 AM PST by dwbh1342
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson