Posted on 04/03/2002 6:38:47 PM PST by sheltonmac
Yes, we have our problems with overtaxation, overregulation, excessive big government and so forth. But all of these problems can be addressed by the people and in accordance with our Constitution.
Despite our shortcomings, is there anyplace else on Earth better to live? What would be gained for any state or states that secede? But that is a hypothetical question because it will never happen.
Abraham Lincoln
First Inaugural Address
Monday, March 4, 1861
...In your hands, my dissatisfied fellow-countrymen, and not in mine, is the momentous issue of civil war. The Government will not assail you. You can have no conflict without being yourselves the aggressors. You have no oath registered in heaven to destroy the Government, while I shall have the most solemn one to "preserve, protect, and defend it."
I am loath to close. We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.
Lincoln,a man for the times.
Did I say that violence to prevent secession would be justified? I merely pointed out that the only previous serious attempt to secede resulted in hindreds of thousands of deaths.
There are a great many activities that you have the right to engage in, but that still would be a very poor idea. For instance, you have the moral right to go to a bar in a bad part of town, get really drunk and flash a lot of cash while loudly spouting ethnic slurs.
Violence against you would be very likely under this scenario. It wouldn't be justified, but you'd still be in the hospital, if you were lucky.
AGYG is pleading to get the rust out as she is from Seattle - let's go to TX - please???
I've heard a lot of people tell me why secession would never work. The stupidest objection that one self-appointed intellectual spouted was "well, what about the Internet? We'd be cut off from that." Granted, this was a few years ago and she was just new to the idea of going online, but hel-LO? It's called the World Wide Web for a reason! ;)
If you want a great example of propaganda, read this article again. Attempting to equate a war of words with a war where millions of Americans lost their lives constitutes the most outrageous example of historical revisionism I've yet seen. Such practices are usually reserved for liberal liars, and the author of this piece obviously studied liberal liars very well.
I'm getting damn sick and tired of seeing these postings by authors who obviously haven't spent the requisite amount of time studying the Civil War. Their ignorance is transparent to those of us who have. My suggestion to future Lincoln bashers is to examine ALL of the contemporary documentation, then sit and think about it using the power of reason, as opposed to emotion, and get back to us. Don't put a post up here by someone who obviously is emotion opinionated and hasn't done his homework.
Thanks for the bump
I wonder if the Texan men would be willing to allow us women-who-wear-flannel-shirts into their state? I would have to learn to take 3 hours to do my make-up and hair. I would have to allow going to the beauty shop to be "way of life" instead of a quarterly obligation. Perhaps I could learn to live with big hair and loop earrings big enough to lasso a man? I prefer gold to silver and don't know if I could change that.....
Who fired on Fort Sumter?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.