Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Restorer
Sorry, must clarify: "killed ... for treason, not for being Catholic."

That's what I was arguing for, or about. I see you're going for the burning part. Don't know about that, I was just going for the sanctioned-killing-on-religious-grounds part.

Thus, Cromwell.

22 posted on 04/04/2002 1:04:36 PM PST by Mr. Thorne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Thorne
There is a fine line between the two, I agree. However, throughout the period of religious contention there were highly prominent Catholics in Britain, including nobility and courtiers. At times the persecution became intense. But much of the time it consisted mostly of monetary fines for not attending C of E services.

However, at least partially in reaction to the persecution, it is a fact that some Catholics engaged in treason. Various Catholic nobles plotted to kill Queen Elizabeth and replace her with Mary of Scotland. Guy Fawkes' conspiracy, which almost succeeded, would have wiped out the British equivalent of the President, both houses of Congress and the Supreme Court.

It is also a fact that the most prominent Catholic countries during this period did not have a level of limited tolerance for Protestants similar to that Catholics had in Britain, the Netherlands, Prussia and most other Protestant countries. Protestants were "cleansed" out of France (where a lot of them had engaged in treason, too). Any appearance of potential Protestantism was stomped on quickly in Spain or Italy.

23 posted on 04/04/2002 4:19:17 PM PST by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson