If you don't show me that math, this argument is so much wind. It amounts to saying that, because I can't conceive how something occured, therefore the odds against it are astronomical. This would be transparent nonsense if it were not so often accompanied by polysyllabic scientisms and apparent examples concocted from the imagination, as with Behe et. al.
Great article, really socks it to the dust loving atheists! Of course to them, rhetoric and fantasy is more valid than science.