Brown was supposedly carrying a briefcase full of documentation that would expose people in the White House. That briefcase was somehow never found. Let's talk about that. I see that as more important than the loss of his bodyguard's gun and whether it could have been used to kill him.
If I was the hit man, I would have taken the BG's gun away from him, but not used it on Ron Brown. I would use something that could not be identified or traced. Including the projectile itself.
Imagine what would BE revealed if they'd DO an autopsy on Brown! Ashcroft has a duty to clear this up. If he doesn't then he has a reason that he needs to explain to us. If he won't, then it is probably an indication that HE is no different than Gormley ... bought and paid for. And the "owner" has to be Bush, wouldn't you say? So that means Bush must either be hiding something equally bad that the democRATS know about (a sort of mutual assured destruction threat between the parties) or Bush is also bought and paid for. Perhaps that is why the move-on'ers seem to fear the Brown case so much? They can't argue it so they try to ignore it hoping it will go away. But it is not going away. Move-on'ers are always telling us that WE should do something. So why don't we ask the members what they think at the next local Republican chapter meeting? Let's make this a campaign issue within the GOP! Accept NO EXCUSES.