The crash itself was the subject of much controversy. Originally claimed to have happened in the Adriatic itself, subsequent news stories slowly but surely moved the wreckage from sea to hilltop.
Another possibility is that the events were reversed. First they cut off communicatin and crash the plane by spoofing it into the ground into pre-determined location. Then a clean up crew moves in before rescue parties can arrive and delivered a coup-de-grace to make sure. Remember, Dr. Wecht said that other than the hole in Brown's head, his injuries appeared survivable.
Why not just plant a bomb on the plane? Then you could blame the Serbs or something.
Because then there would definitely be a criminal investigation involving the FBI, which you might not be able to control. And look how good the FBI is at finding the source of bombs when it is admitted to be a bomb. Furthermore, a criminal investigation involves motive and looking at other peculiarities in what happened (like certain individuals missing the plane). Some of those individuals might not stand up to close scrutiny.
I'm sorry, I enjoy a good conspiracy theory as much as the next guy, but this one is just too far fetched.
Again, you have the cart before the horse. Why are you so afraid of a simple exhumation and autopsy? If it turns up nothing then no harm. The democRATS should like that because it would finally put this one to rest ... and this is the one they fear most. Rather than dismiss it because you think it is too far fetched, why don't you actually address the facts that we know. We know that all of the forensic pathologists who have looked at the case and made public statements in any forum say that the wound in his head was very suspicioius and he should have been autopsied. We know that the AFIP management lied about the nature of the wound and the opinions of their staff experts. We know that the official reports states that it was blunt force trauma and even the pathologist who concluded that has now admitted that the reason he gave for reaching that conclusion are not true. In other words, he was caught lying and has had to retract those lies. We know that the Whitehouse, against existing law, ordered that there be no autopsy. We know that the Air Force skipped what is normally the first phase of a crash investigation ... the phase that specifically is tasked with finding the cause. We know they lost transponder and radio contact with the plane at the same time when the plane was still 8 miles from the crash, yet this has not been explained. We know that a beacon went missing just before the crash ... the type of beacon needed to spoof the plane into flying the wrong course. We know that person in charge of that beacon and those at the airport died under suspicious circumstance a short time after the crash before he could be interviewed. We know that there is sworn testimony indicating that Brown threatened Clinton and the DNC shortly before a flight that originally, according to the same testimony, he was not supposed to be on. We know that a number of key figures in other clinton scandals just happened to miss the flight. And I could list many other suspicious facts. In other words, deal with the facts.
It would be interesting to see, by way of comparison, what sorts of injuries people killed in non-suspicious plane crashes suffer.
I would presume the pathologists mentioned above know this ... don't you think?
The crash itself was the subject of much controversy. Originally claimed to have happened in the Adriatic itself, subsequent news stories slowly but surely moved the wreckage from sea to hilltop.