Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnHuang2
First, the liberal academicians rallied for "free love," discarding the time-honored traditions of marriage and family. Then, they foisted on us the acceptance of "gay love" and admonished people to ignore the laws of nature and decency. After that came "fetish and violent love." Suddenly, Ramada Inns and Howard Johnson hotels started transforming into dungeons for bondage, domination, and sadomasochism conventions. Now, they're promoting "pedophilic love" and the lack of public outrage is stunning. What will come next: a push for bestiality?

Like climbing a staircase, each new step towards greater perversion builds upon the societal "acceptance" of the ones before it. Only this staircase is leading down to a morass of moral decay that will ultimately destroy our civilization. I don't know if there exists a hell, but we're surely creating one.

11 posted on 04/05/2002 6:23:28 PM PST by SpyGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SpyGuy;JohnHuang2;GrandMoM;ethical;moyden;johniegrad;chiefqc;bleudevil;maryz;LadyDoc...
Bump!


From "On the Pedophilia Issue: What the APA Should Have Known"

" More Recent Defenses of Pedophilia

Harris Mirkin recently wrote a lead article in the Journal of Homosexuality entitled "The Pattern of Sexual Politics: Feminism, Homosexuality and Pedophilia." Using social-constructionist theory, he argues that the concept of child molestation is a "culture- and class-specific creation" which can and should be changed.

He likens the battle for the legalization of pedophilia to the battles for women's rights, homosexual rights, and even the civil rights of blacks.

He sees the hoped-for shift as taking place in two stages. During the first stage, the opponents of pedophilia control the debate by insisting that the issue is non-negotiable--while using psychological and moral categories to silence all discussion.

But in the second stage, Mirkin says, the discussion must move on to such issues as the "right" of children to have and enjoy sex.

If this paradigm shift could be accomplished, the issue would move from the moral to the political arena, and therefore become open to negotiation. For example, rather than decrying sexual abuse, lawmakers would be forced to argue about when and under what conditions adult/child sex could be accepted. Once the issues becomes "discussible," it would only be a matter of time before the public would begin to view pedophilia as another sexual orientation, and not a choice for the pedophile..."


12 posted on 04/07/2002 8:49:44 AM PDT by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson