[Dimensio]

Reisman wrote that "the truly amazing fact is that at the time the activities required to perform the 'research' on children to obtain data on their 'sexuality' would have involved actions that were clearly criminal in all 50 states of the USA and that these criminal activities were being committed under the protection and with knowledge of the Indiana University. "

I hate to put myself in a minority position here (and I'm certainly not going to try and defend the book in question) but Reisman's claims wrt the Kinsey study are well refuted. She even sued for slander when reports came out that she was "mistaken" in her allegations and was laughed out of court after her attorney withdrew from the case.

I can think of a number of reputable people who I would considered qualified to criticize the book, but Judith Reisman isn't one of them.

[ethical]

I am quite familiar with Reismans work and interviews with former Kinsey researchers that back her up. I have read Kinseys "research" and it does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that he was molesting children, watching them be molested or had knowledge of ongoing child molestation's and did nothing about it. Kinsey says in his own work HIS own words that ya might want to try masturbating an infant who is crying to calm them down. The man was a major quack and a major pervert. That is indisputable.