Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: veronica
The so-called Christians (non-evangelicals) in the Middle East came up with the following anti-Israel statement in recent years:

The Following Statement was adopted by the Standing Conference of Middle Eastern Christian & Muslim Religious Leaders at their meeting in Englewood, New Jersey on Wednesday, November 8, 2000

The recent wave of violence in the Middle East is of grave concern. We condemn the violence, especially the excessive use of force by Israeli forces that has resulted in the killing of over 150 and the injury of 3,000 Palestinian civilians in the Occupied Palestinian Territory including Jerusalem.

The demonstrations and protests that have been taking place in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including Jerusalem, represent the collective expression by the Palestinian people against the long years of occupation and the difficulties of their daily lives under Israeli occupation.

The protests have been an expression of deep frustration with the failure of the peace process to bring about better living conditions and a final peace settlement, including the long-awaited establishment of an independent Palestinian state.

They have been an expression of their determination to protect their holy places. They have been an expression in defense of their inalienable rights and their land.

Regrettably, the Palestinian people continue to be denied the ability to restore even their minimum rights as a people, including the right to self-determination. We express our solidarity with the Palestinian people, who have been the victims of a long and unjust military occupation, and we call for the realization of their rights.

We express our deep concern and strong feelings regarding the sacred religious sites in Occupied East Jerusalem. We stress the importance of Jerusalem and the need to ensure respect for all holy sites. Any final solution must ensure the freedom of access and of worship for all believers of the three monotheistic religions. Any solution must also ensure Palestinian sovereignty over East Jerusalem.

We believe that what is required now is an immediate cessation by Israel of the excessive, indiscriminate and unjustified use of force against the Palestinian people. The Israeli siege on the Palestinian people and the Palestinian land must be terminated. To restore calm, the understanding reached at the Sharm EI-Sheikh Summit must be implemented. Only then can there be any true resumption of the peace process between the Palestinian and the Israeli sides. Such a process must require a sincere desire for peace and a full commitment on the part of all parties to its realization.

We believe that in order to resolve this tragic conflict between the Palestinians and the Israelis, the UN Resolutions 242, 338 and 425 (concerning the farmlands of Shib'aa Lebanon) must be fully implemented because they express the will of the international community. In addition, we strongly believe that Resolution 194 and the Geneva Convention of 1949, namely Article IV, give the Palestinian refugees, whether they are in Lebanon or Syria, etc. the right to return to their homes and land which they have inhabited from time immemorial. The right of refugees to return home is a most sacred right and it should be respected.

As for the role of the United States in the Middle East peace process, we stress our disappointment with the adoption by our American Congress of the very unfair and very biased resolution #426 against the leadership of the Palestinian people. We demand a more balanced American position reflective of American traditions and the wishes of more than five million Arab-Americans in support of human rights, justice and international law. Such a position would enable the United States to play a truly objective and supportive role as a sponsor of the peace process.

In conclusion, our support for the Middle East peace process is unwavering. Our support for the rights of the Palestinian people and their efforts to realize those rights, including their right to an independent state, is unwavering as well. The time has come for justice and peace to prevail in the Holy Land and the realization of the rights of the Palestinian people as well as security for all states in the region.

The Most Reverend Metropolitan PHILIP, Chairman Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of North America

The Most Reverend Archbishop Oshagan Choloyan Prelacy of the Armenian Apostolic Church of America

The Right Reverend Bishop Stephen Doueihi Eparchy of Saint Maron of Brooklyn Imam Fadhel AI-Sahlani Imam AI-Khoei Islamic Center, Jamaica, NY

The Most Reverend John A. Elya Eparch of Newton, Melkite Diocese of Newton

Very Reverend Chorepiscopus John Meno For The Most Reverend Archbishop Cyril Aphrem Karim Archdiocese of the Syrian Orthodox Church for the Eastern United States

Sheikh Sami T. Merhi, Chairman The Druze Council of North America

Sheikh Hamad Ahmad Chebli Islamic Society of Central New Jersey

19 posted on 04/05/2002 9:08:33 AM PST by geros
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: geros
The "palestinians" themselves contradict every premise they claim to hold. In particular, their "respect" for holy sites is clearly negated by their very current activities to despoil every site in the Holy Land that is revered by Christians and Jews alike. In Bethlehem and Hebron, they are rushing to raise up their despicable mosques, so then they can cry "holy". That they hold nothing holy, Abraham in particular (as far as his life in the land of Israel). There is nothing holy or important to Moslems in that whole land. Check out the histories on this, it is true. Mohammed himself repudiated the whole Moslem myth about Jerusalem.

They clearly do not respect the holy sites, so do not respect theirs. They do not respect peace, don't give them peace. They do not respect the right to land, don't give them land.

32 posted on 04/05/2002 11:53:06 AM PST by mcsparkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: geros
Any person who insists on calling himself by titles such as "Right Reverend" or the "Most Reverend" doesn't understand or believe in the fact that there is only one who is reverend. I have no use for religious Christians who insist on such titles.

By the way, I am a licensed minister who refuses to use the title Rev. When I speak in various churches I ask them to just print my name or if they want to use a title they are to simply use Mr.

35 posted on 04/05/2002 12:02:43 PM PST by JeepInMazar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson