Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Part 3: False Teaching Sabotages Aspiring Priests
NewsMax ^ | 4-6-2002 | Phil Brennan

Posted on 04/06/2002 6:55:08 AM PST by Notwithstanding

False Teaching Sabotages Aspiring Priests

Phil Brennan, NewsMax.com
Saturday, April 6, 2002
Editor's note: See part one of this series, Anti-Catholic 'Experts' Fuel Church's Scandals, and part two, Homosexual Culture Undercuts Priesthood.

Second only to the scandal of homosexual domination of many U.S. seminaries is the watering down, and in some cases outright abandonment, of the tenets of the Roman Catholic faith.

In Chapter 5 of Goodbye! Good Men: How Catholic Seminaries Turned Away Two Generations of Vocations From the Priesthood, Michael S. Rose examines the destructive effect of what he terms heterodoxy on seminarians struggling to absorb and adhere to the ancient doctrines of the church, handed down from the Apostles for 2,000 years.

"Many faculty members are adverse to teaching what the Church teaches, and some even find it onerous to hide their disdain for Catholicism," Rose wrote.

"The seminarian who arrives on campus expecting to find faculty and staff who love the Catholic faith and teach what the Church teaches can be sadly disappointed."

Among the students' obstacles to learning the authentic tenets of their faith, Rose reveals, are being forced to read textbooks written by "noted dissenters from Catholic teachings" such as theologians Richard McBrien, Edward Schillebeeckx, Hans Kung and Charles Curran, who "parrot the dogmas of Catholic dissent."

Tossing out the Bible

They are taught that the Bible is not to be taken seriously because it is "culture bound," that one religion is as good as the next, that the pope is not infallible, that the presence of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist is just an old pre-Vatican II myth, that Christ wasn't divine, that God is a woman, that Mass is nothing more than a meal, that women should be ordained priests, that homosexuality is normal and that contraception is morally acceptable.

Though many outside the Catholic Church might agree with some if not all of these heretical doctrines, for Catholics, accepting them means simply that they are no longer Catholics. For many seminarians seeking admission to the priesthood, they sound the death knell of their vocations. Why, after all, should they give their lives to what they have been taught contradicts everything they believed the church stood for?

Yet, Rose reveals that for more than 30 years, this nonsense has been standard fare in many of the courses taught to priests.

Rot From Within

Many of the ideas being taught in seminaries today, Rose wrote, "go way beyond the scope of even these 'mainstream' errors of Modernist doctrine. Aggressive feminist theories often put forth by religious sisters devoted to liberation theology and various incarnations of Jungian psychology make it clear that some faculty members who are entrusted with the formation of future priests do not support the Catholic priesthood as the Church defines it. In fact they do not support the Church, her hierarchy, her Eucharist, or her liturgy."

Tragically, throughout the U.S. today, men taught these heretical doctrines are spreading error, distorting the liturgy, sowing doctrinal confusion and changing the faith of countless Catholics.

On page after page Rose documents instances of deliberate distortion of church doctrines - lapses most often defended not only by seminary officials, but also by the bishops of the dioceses they serve. Most of the abuses are simply mind-boggling.

Feminist Fanaticism



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catholic; homosexual; scandal

1 posted on 04/06/2002 6:55:08 AM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: patent; jmj333; father_elijah; auntpolgara; dumb_ox; aquinasfan; arrogant bustard; Dr. Brian Kopp
please ping all around
2 posted on 04/06/2002 6:59:08 AM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
"...God as androgynous - neither male nor female..."

The CCC agrees with the feminazi nun in this regard - while God chose to reveal himself as Father, to incarnate as Son, and refer to the Holy Spirit as male, it makes sense that God is not bound by such human limitations and understandings. God is much bigger than gender - and since men and women are created in His divine image, it makes sense that God could not be exclusively male.

3 posted on 04/06/2002 7:08:28 AM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
CCC # 370: In no way is God in man's image. He is neither man nor woman. God is pure spirit in which there is no place for the difference between the sexes. But the respective "perfections" of man and woman reflect something of the infinite perfection of God: those of a mother and those of a father and husband.
footnote 241: 241 Cf. Is 49:14-15; 66: 13; Ps 131:2-3; Hos 11:1-4; Jer 3:4- 19

http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/p1s2c1p6.htm

4 posted on 04/06/2002 7:21:27 AM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
BTW, I look forward to reading Rose's book for I presume he has done thorough research and his book will pressure the leaders to lead!
5 posted on 04/06/2002 7:24:38 AM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
My understanding of the reason that the dissent is taught is not that it is part of what a Priest should believe, but rather part of what a Priest should know is the dissent, so that the Priest would be able to answer questions brought.

Sort of like why I fully intend to have my kids read Marx- not so that they turn into Marxissts, but so that I can innoculate them against Marxism.

Now, if this has worked in the church or not, that is a completely different question.

6 posted on 04/06/2002 7:29:24 AM PST by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
it makes sense that God could not be exclusively male.

It may "make sense" to you, and it may be a perfectly reasonable line of thought, however Catholic Doctrine holds that God our Father is male. Period.

You can debate the fact until the cows come home, but teaching outside the bounds of established church doctrine is just plain wrong.

I would be just as shocked if an LDS seminary was teaching that the Book of Mormon was written from one man's imagination, or if a Muslim place of learning were to teach that Mohammed never visited the dome of the rock.

If I paid good money to see the Titanic and the theater began showing the Godfather I'd be pretty angry. You don't have to be a Catholic to be as outraged as we are about these heresies in our seminaries.

7 posted on 04/06/2002 7:35:33 AM PST by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dales
While I read leftish trash to know what they are up to, the folks who teach this crap at seminaries and "catholic" institutions are leftists who are using the Church's dime to undermine the Church's doctrines and Christ's gospel.

A chaste seminarian has no need to read a sperverted sex manual in order to understand what Barney Frank or Ellen Degeneres do in bed.

A survey of dissent is fine - an endorsement of it at a Catholic institution (WHICH IS PRECISELY WHAT IS TAUGHT BY THESE FOLKS) is evil.

8 posted on 04/06/2002 7:37:48 AM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Your factual error as to what is Catholic Doctrine is exposed by my quote from the official Catechism in post 4 above. Yes, God is Father and Son and Paraclete. But he is more.
9 posted on 04/06/2002 7:39:59 AM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
No argument from me. I think it is clear that the leftists have used this to great advantage.
10 posted on 04/06/2002 7:42:56 AM PST by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
""If the bishops and rectors don't know this kind of rot is eating away at the innards of the Church, at its future vitality, that's misfeasance. If they do know but do nothing to stop it, that's malfeasance. And the faithful should demand top-to-bottom house cleanings where such situations exist! Certainly, they are not morally obliged to financially support this ecclesiastical incompetence."

BINNNNNGO!!

11 posted on 04/06/2002 8:01:28 AM PST by redhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Does the book have an imprimatur and nihil obstat?
12 posted on 04/06/2002 10:09:16 AM PST by Renatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Bump
13 posted on 04/07/2002 9:09:23 AM PDT by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Thanks so much for posting this series! I can't wait until I get the book.
14 posted on 04/07/2002 9:47:18 AM PDT by BlessedBeGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod
Seems like it will be real a page turner and together with the scandals now being so public perhaps will help force a clean up.
15 posted on 04/07/2002 11:02:31 AM PDT by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson