Did they belong to some "jewish" church you would like to define as Goebbles did? Do you feel so much superior when you give yourself the right to insult people at large like this?
The fact is that the church has been labeling Israelies lately in a heinous manner, and of course, you who label people in a heinous manner, cannot come to grip to consider the good reason when some organisation condemns such heinous behavior.
Wake up, Christ went on the cross to settle himself the differences. Why should the church and you go on and define things as they wish again? Can't you guys learn that the trial was over and done with 2000 years ago? That bringing it again is a mortal sin?
If only people refrained from defining, but embraced the jurisdictions transcending their right to pick and chose definitions for peoples, jurisdictions demanding that they implore indentity restraint before the identity of God. We would be done and over with the Church defining it as "Palestinians" "humiliated", or calling others deniers of Euro-holocaust, and on with peace and prosperity.
But no, it is too much to ask to the little Nazies who love the identities and the revolutions, who take sides, or worse, define sides, instead of imploring their restraints and their identities.
Purely defensive. I don't believe in revisiting history and blaming groups for what individuals do. But if people want to blame the Catholic Church for the Holocaust I'll bring up other history.
Those who want to pin Eichmann on Christianity better expect to have Kaganovitch and Bela Kun pinned on them.