Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lesbians: We Made Our Baby Deaf on Purpose [we've reached the bottom of the slippery slope]
This Is London ^ | 4-8-2002 | James Langton

Posted on 04/08/2002 11:29:29 AM PDT by Notwithstanding


News
  Lesbians: We made our baby deaf on purpose

by James Langton in New York

A deaf lesbian couple have admitted deliberately creating what are believed to be the world's first designer handicapped babies.

The two women tracked down a deaf sperm donor to ensure that their daughter, who is now five, would inherit the same inherited hearing disabilty that they both share.

The couple were so pleased with the result that they have just had a second child, called Gauvin, using the same technique. Doctors who examined the boy say he is completely deaf in one ear and has only partial hearing in the other.

In an interview with the Washington Post, the women - Sharon Duchesneau, who gave birth, and Candace McCullough, her lesbian lover - say that they believe deafness is "an identity not a medical affliction that needs to be fixed".

They were so desperate to have children who share their handicap that the women asked their local sperm bank to provide a deaf donor, but were told congential hearing loss immediately disqualifies candidates.

Instead they turned to a deaf male friend for help, producing what they call their first "perfect baby" - their five-year-old daughter Jehanne. Before their son was born, the women said: "A hearing baby would be a blessing; a deaf baby would be a special blessing.''

Both women, who are in their mid thirties, belong to a radical school of thought that believes deafness is a "cultural identity" not a handicap.

They want their children to share the same "experiences" including learning, sign language and going to special schools for the deaf.

They also consulted a "genetic counsellor" before getting pregnant who told them that with Miss Duchesneau's background, that includes four generations of deafness on her mother's side, any child conceived with a deaf sperm donor would have a 50 per cent chance of having the same handicap.

After their daughter's first hearing test, the couple wrote happily in her baby book: "Oct 11, 1996 - no response at 95 decibels - DEAF!'' Their daughter attends a special kindergarten for children with hearing problems.

After tests on their baby son showed he also had severe problems, they decided against giving him a deaf aid in the one ear that still has some hearing, saying they will leave the decision to him when he is older.

The couple's behaviour has appalled children's rights groups in the United States. The conservative Family Research Council said their decision to "intentionally give a child a disability" was "incredibly selfish".

The council's spokesman, Fred Connor, said: "These women are taking the idea of creating so-called designer babies to a horrible new level.''

Even a leading member of the American National Association for the Deaf, Nancy Rarus, said she "can't understand why anyone would want to bring a disabled child into the world".


Email this article to a friend</ a>


© Associated Newspapers Ltd., 08 April 2002
Terms and Conditions
This Is London

 


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Free Republic; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cultureofdeath; deaf; homosexual; homosexualagenda; sasu; socalledlesbian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-213 next last
Comment #141 Removed by Moderator

To: Notwithstanding
can we make a case for abuse?
142 posted on 04/09/2002 2:13:39 PM PDT by modern_orthodox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Sick doesn't begin to cover it. An abomination is what it is.
143 posted on 04/09/2002 2:16:24 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rytwyng
(Make a deal with the devil, he eventually collects the debt.)

So what is this kid going to do when the teenage hormones are raging and parents get rebelled against?

How is this child going to deal with the fact that he is deaf by design?

I am sure the Devil will get his due.

144 posted on 04/09/2002 2:18:22 PM PDT by eFudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
What would Jesus do?

Certainly wouldn't 'cure the couple', as that would be contrary to the concept of 'free will'. There's no merit to behaving yourself if your only choice is to behave yourself. Otherwise, what's the point of having "Hell"?

Cure Gauvin? Maybe.

No sarcasm intended above.

145 posted on 04/09/2002 2:28:34 PM PDT by DuncanWaring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: AlexanderTheGreat
Btw, I like the way you spelled your moniker. It's very Viking and Norse mythos. I'm serious.

No, I'm a Celt. I originally contracted "rightwing" to "rytwyng", not to sound "Norse", but to make it short enough to fit on a personalized license plate! I later concluded that it worked better as a screenname.

FYI, I don't buy the Norse mythos at all. I have to admit, some of their rituals sound interesting, but not enough to walk away from Christ (nothing is.)

146 posted on 04/09/2002 2:28:57 PM PDT by Rytwyng
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: AlexanderTheGreat
homosexuality exists naturally in the animal kingdom...

Got any examples?

147 posted on 04/09/2002 2:31:49 PM PDT by DuncanWaring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: eFudd
So what is this kid going to do when the teenage hormones are raging and parents get rebelled against? ... How is this child going to deal with the fact that he is deaf by design? I am sure the Devil will get his due.

Maybe not. Perhaps the rebellion will lead to heterosexuality, Christianity, and -- God willing -- a miraculous healing.

148 posted on 04/09/2002 3:03:17 PM PDT by Rytwyng
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

Comment #149 Removed by Moderator

To: meandog
I concur.

Trajan88 TAMU Class of '88

150 posted on 04/09/2002 5:23:29 PM PDT by Trajan88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #151 Removed by Moderator

To: DuncanWaring
Animals will also eat their young and resort to cannibalism.

Dogs will eat feces.

If this is the behavior that Alex aspires to...

152 posted on 04/09/2002 6:42:41 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Cancer, spina bifida, and diabetes also occur in nature. Does that make them good, too?
153 posted on 04/09/2002 6:52:01 PM PDT by DuncanWaring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
The birth announcement appeared to be just that, an announcement(I posted it here), but in articles on the "couple", there is mention of them writing "Deaf!" in the child's baby book and PBS and the Washington Post have not condemmed their actions (they've done this twice so far now).

The notion that the homosexual subculture or deaf subculture aren't encompassing enough to embrace these women and her kids shows our splintered society.

What's next, a website/support group for Lesbian Mothers Raising Deaf Boy Children Deliberately Conceived Deaf? Sounds like they've been watching Jerry Springer and Ricki Lake a bit too much.

154 posted on 04/09/2002 7:05:14 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan;rintense;homeschool mama
Ping and barf and PRAYERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
155 posted on 04/09/2002 7:46:47 PM PDT by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Evil, Evil, Evil. I cannot express my anger at the "experiment" these queers have created. I pray for the son, my heart goes out to him. I wish he could be adopted by a LOVING family.
156 posted on 04/09/2002 7:52:14 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Sick and wrong.
157 posted on 04/09/2002 7:59:58 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I still care
Oftentimes deafness is associated with other congenital disorders. I wonder how happy these two would be with a deaf cyclops child, etc. (wide variety of possibilities)
158 posted on 04/09/2002 8:36:01 PM PDT by eartotheground
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
This is cruel. Extremely cruel. It is a form of child abuse. Not only that, but for the most selfish of reasons these two pieces of slime created a handicapped child ( make that two ) on purpose.

At the very least, they belong in jail.

159 posted on 04/09/2002 8:51:06 PM PDT by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
They want their children to share the same "experiences" including learning, sign language and going to special schools for the deaf.

and lesbianism?????

160 posted on 04/09/2002 8:59:23 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-213 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson