Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lesbians: We Made Our Baby Deaf on Purpose [we've reached the bottom of the slippery slope]
This Is London ^ | 4-8-2002 | James Langton

Posted on 04/08/2002 11:29:29 AM PDT by Notwithstanding

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-213 next last
To: Nakatu X
How about this: People grow up, fall in love, get married and have babies (in that order). Then whatever happens, happens. I know, that's awfully parochial of me, isn't it?
61 posted on 04/08/2002 12:25:12 PM PDT by gridlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: eastsider
This is perhaps the most disturbing post I've read on FR. Agreed.

(Got the book to Romulus yesterday.)

62 posted on 04/08/2002 12:27:58 PM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
This must really upset the liberals who put their hope in evolution.
63 posted on 04/08/2002 12:28:55 PM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boxsford
Yep, but as for the child, perhaps another opportunity to show God's grace. The kids need our prayers. Consider how one of Madelaine Murray O'Hare's kids latter turned to God and became a missionary?/pastor? I suspect God will have the final word on whether or not the kids will get to hear.
64 posted on 04/08/2002 12:32:55 PM PDT by Cvengr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: I still care
Howdy

I agree with you, these sick people must foot the bill for every expense associated with their diseased handiwork.

But I would go further, this should be treated as an act of violence identical to plunging an ice pick into a baby's ear to achieve the same result.

What's the difference?

Child abuse is child abuse by whatever means, this is actionable and a message must be sent that designing children to produce handicaps will not be tolerated by society.

That's what the law is for IMHO.

65 posted on 04/08/2002 12:38:03 PM PDT by MoscowMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nina0113
Nobody in their right minds (which these two harpies obviously are NOT) would desire that their child be disabled.

Indeed, and nobody in their right mind would think that having children or being able to adopt children is a "right." These twisted, evil, selfish, self-centered whores have succumbed to the mindset that having children is about them, not the children. It seems that people with a leftist viewpoint, especially homosexuals, think that children are a tool, a weapon, in the cultural battles over behavior and identity politics. It's not about what's best for children anymore.

66 posted on 04/08/2002 12:39:23 PM PDT by PetiteMericco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
I'm still pissed at my old man for making me bald!
67 posted on 04/08/2002 12:42:48 PM PDT by KevinB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
Thanks, Askel!
68 posted on 04/08/2002 12:47:38 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
This should be a clear object lesson to the crowd that always seeks to say that everyone is equal, despite their handicaps. It's another example of moral relativism run amuk.

Here are two women who have been brainwashed to think that their handicap has no downside, even though they have had to overcome that handicap. It's the valueless society that exists today. One condition is no better than the next.

This mindset is so pervasive that people are actually unable to discern that Israel has the moral obligation to stop terrorism perpetrated against it. Why both the Palestinians and Israelis are equal, how can we approve of Israel's military actions against it's neighbor. It's as if the terrorism had no value at all. It's value neutral. But occupation in an effort to end it, is evil.

Whew, we have a bunch of loons out there.

69 posted on 04/08/2002 12:56:20 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: meandog
Tie their tubes, and take their tots!

Actually, I think that this is a bit harsh.

Just make sure that all of the 'goodies' that their intentionally-deaf offspring get are paid for by the parents. No government subsidies, no handouts, none.

Things like this make me want to stamp out freeby-handouts by the government. Just another reason for that to stop. Sickening.

70 posted on 04/08/2002 12:59:01 PM PDT by Frohickey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
I didn't think it was possible to get worse than Nazis. But the homosexual/identity politics axis has succeeded.

Once upon a time, everyone thought that the greatest potential abuse of genetic engineering was to create "perfect" babies -- strong, smart, healthy, attractive, etc -- but the Sapphites are now deliberately creating disabled babies instead. They actually make the Nazi eugenists look good by comparison. Sad.

I am reminded of certain beggars in India that deliberately amputate limbs from their children to gain sympathy and, of course, handouts of money. Is that, perhaps, what these women are really about? Is deliberate creation of disability the next wave in governmental dependence and social demands?

71 posted on 04/08/2002 1:12:18 PM PDT by Rytwyng
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog
Tie their tubes, and take their tots!

I think "spaying" is the word that would apply to these to animals. Well, maybe not. Animals aren't as cruel.

72 posted on 04/08/2002 1:14:27 PM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Trinity5
Oops, absolutely not! This is a horrendous action and no laughing matter.
73 posted on 04/08/2002 1:33:14 PM PDT by A Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: KevinB
I'm still pissed at my old man for making me bald!

The Nuns always taught me that that was something you did to yourself! Talk about abuse!

74 posted on 04/08/2002 1:43:36 PM PDT by gridlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
These two 'ladies' are already living perverted lives. Why should we be surprised when they prove how perverted they are in new and creative ways?
75 posted on 04/08/2002 1:48:44 PM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
well, i guess it's more humane than to just puncture a child's eardrums

ugh to these two

76 posted on 04/08/2002 1:51:18 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
I felt like hitting the Report Abuse button, but know that there is nothing I can do to report this couple for their abuse.

...they decided against giving him a deaf aid in the one ear that still has some hearing, saying they will leave the decision to him when he is older.

This decision isn't being made on religious grounds, the typical reason cited for denying aid. They are deliberately hobbling this child. No better than the Eastern Europeans who break a kid's legs before sending him out on a career begging for money (you're damned if you do give because it only rewards the vicious parents, and you're damned if you don't give because the kids starve and get beaten for not eaning their keep).

Rush Limbaugh encountered this train of thought when he was seeking treatment for his deafness.

77 posted on 04/08/2002 1:56:37 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke
Reactionary? How would you feel if these dragons had born healthy children them stabbed them in the ears to make them deaf? Would you feel the need to wipe them off the planet then? 'Cause that's basically what they have done. Reactionary my arse. They should be flogged, canned, keel-hauled and then shot.

EBUCK

78 posted on 04/08/2002 1:58:48 PM PDT by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ArGee
While I see no reason to be upset that this couple would want to "bring a handicapped child into the world" (the alternative raises the specter of eugenics)

Why take chances? Adopt or offer foster care for a deaf child. If their child had not been born deaf, they would have forever distanced their child (even if it was never "spoken") because that child never met their expectations.

Have they thought about offering their services to a deaf community center? Helping the kids to feel "empowered"? Or do they not care about other peoples' kids?

A couple of control freaks, this lot is.

79 posted on 04/08/2002 2:06:45 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nakatu X
You have presented great points, IMO. Your point #1 really does reframe the issue in my mind. Thanks...
80 posted on 04/08/2002 2:07:19 PM PDT by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-213 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson