To: Kalashnikov_68
There is no "right" to purchase books anonymously. And there isn't a "right" to hide whether or not you bought a particular book when that book is linked to a criminal act, as is the case here.
To: spqrzilla9
There is no "right" to purchase books anonymously. What makes you so sure?
12 posted on
04/08/2002 2:34:53 PM PDT by
freeeee
To: spqrzilla9
There is no "right" to purchase books anonymously. And there isn't a "right" to hide whether or not you bought a particular book when that book is linked to a criminal act, as is the case here. Sure, you say that now. Would you have felt the same way if Clinton's America still existed. You and Randy Weaver would have shared a cell in the federal pen.
To: spqrzilla9
Hey...how is this possible? :-)
| spqrzilla9 |
member since December 15th, 1990 |
|
To: spqrzilla9
This is why all books should be burned.
To: spqrzilla9
There is no "right" to purchase books anonymously. And there isn't a "right" to hide whether or not you bought a particular book when that book is linked to a criminal act, as is the case here. Did "Publius" have the right to publish the Federalist Papers anonymously, and did buyers have the right to read it anonymously?
60 posted on
04/08/2002 11:18:53 PM PDT by
supercat
To: spqrzilla9
There is no "right" to purchase books anonymously. How about the right of two private parties to do buisness with each other without government interference?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson