Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AlexanderTheGreat
Well, what was her argument?

Apparently she wrote the foreword to a book advocating the "normalization" of adult/child sexual activity. O'Reilly read some passages from the book which poo-pooed what any sane person would call pedophilia.

But Elders would deny what the quote was saying and would basically say that it meant something else.

So, either she is a total pervert, a complete idiot or a little of both. I'll go with the third option.

7 posted on 04/08/2002 5:56:20 PM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Aquinasfan
I'll agree with you. I think she's a little of both too.
8 posted on 04/08/2002 5:57:28 PM PDT by Pyro7480
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Aquinasfan
She's the complete idiot allright. And she's a morally repugnant, leftwing liberal.
24 posted on 04/08/2002 6:20:27 PM PDT by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Aquinasfan
In her first interview about this book (last week) I got the impression that she didn't even know what the book she did the forward for was about. She clarified that tonight. The woman is evil and a moron, but just par for the Clinton course.
46 posted on 04/08/2002 6:58:06 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Aquinasfan
So, either she is a total pervert, a complete idiot or a little of both. I'll go with the third option.

I would agree with your third option with the caveat that she is "a lot" of both.

73 posted on 04/08/2002 9:09:06 PM PDT by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson