To: AlexanderTheGreat
Well, what was her argument? Apparently she wrote the foreword to a book advocating the "normalization" of adult/child sexual activity. O'Reilly read some passages from the book which poo-pooed what any sane person would call pedophilia.
But Elders would deny what the quote was saying and would basically say that it meant something else.
So, either she is a total pervert, a complete idiot or a little of both. I'll go with the third option.
To: Aquinasfan
I'll agree with you. I think she's a little of both too.
8 posted on
04/08/2002 5:57:28 PM PDT by
Pyro7480
To: Aquinasfan
She's the complete idiot allright. And she's a morally repugnant, leftwing liberal.
24 posted on
04/08/2002 6:20:27 PM PDT by
Bullish
To: Aquinasfan
In her first interview about this book (last week) I got the impression that she didn't even know what the book she did the forward for was about. She clarified that tonight. The woman is evil and a moron, but just par for the Clinton course.
To: Aquinasfan
So, either she is a total pervert, a complete idiot or a little of both. I'll go with the third option. I would agree with your third option with the caveat that she is "a lot" of both.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson