When our Senate informed the U.N. that even though Clinton signed the treaty, it still was not effective until and unless the Senate ratified it. The U.N. informed the Senate "Your president signed it, your in".
Very bold talk from a one armed man, but the U.N. foresees power for itself that will over ride every nation on earth, that is it's declared goal. When interviewed about their co-control over US government land, the statement was made, "Americans have forfeited their right to control their own resources, due to their urban sprawl and SUV's, someone had to take over."
They are feeling very brazen, and now want their own global tax so they can be self supporting and tell the US to stuff it and that we have lost our veto power, once they have that ability to be self perpetuating there will be no stopping this entity, because the next thing on their wish list is their own global military outfitted with the best weapons that the USofA can supply, and they will attain it.
The U.N. meeting in Mexico was to accomplish this global tax system and there is no word, not one that I have heard about that says if they were successful or what Bush's position was on it, because he repeatedly refused to say before he left for the meeting, even though he had 4,000 letter's before him from concerned political action committees who had contacted the press to try to force an answer from him.
This is another one of your complete lies. Bush has come out strongly AGAINST the global tax. You're just a dishonest Bush basher. I kept searching your post for the sentence where you gave Bush credit for withdrawing Clinton's agreement that we join this world court. Couldn't find it.
Wouldn't Clinton's signature be unconstitutional?
I thought the Executive and Judiciary branches are co-equal? How can the executive cede away the authority of the judiciary with the wave of a pen?
-PJ