Don't you know? If MAP doesn't know Bush's position, then he must be on the evil side. Please don't throw facts in her path, they get in the way of her Bush bashing. What a propagandist.
Hannity on Fox News quoted the U.N. as saying that "American citizens have forfited their right to control their natural resources because of their urban sprawl and SUV's, someone had to take charge".
Do a google search on the many faces of Agenda 21.
The following article can be viewed at http://www.tax-news.com/asp/story/story.asp?storyname=7181
The United Nations' International Conference on Financing for Development, set to take place in Mexico this March, has set the cat amongst the pigeons with its proposed focus on the creation of an International Tax Organisation, which would enable nations to collect and disseminate information regarding their tax policies, assist governments in taxing emigrant workers, and compel members to share tax data.
Tim Hall, a spokesman for the United Nations, denies that this is on the agenda for the March meeting. 'This has nothing to do with taxing anybody,' he stated. 'That is specifically what this proposal is not about.' He asserted that the UN meeting in Monterrey will be more concerned with 'strengthened international tax cooperation through enhanced dialogue' than with the establishment of an international tax body.
Many in the US are not convinced, and New Hampshire Senator Bob Smith has written to Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill to ask him some pertinent questions on the subject, and suggesting that he should block any proposal for an International Tax Organisation.
"A United Nations conference in mid-March" says Senator Smith, "will be considering proposals to boost foreign aid, including tax harmonization proposals such as information exchange, an International Tax Organization, and global taxes on energy and/or financial transactions. Can you assure me that the United States will block these proposals, all of which would undermine America's competitive advantage in the global economy?"
Senator Smith also asked the following three questions of the Secretary:
Do all nations have the right to determine their own domestic policies so long as they do not create a national security threat to other countries?
Do nations have the right to determine the tax treatment of income earned inside their borders?
Are European welfare states promoting tax harmonization policies that are inconsistent with conservative principles?
Here is a copy of the complete letter:
January 25, 2002
The Honorable Paul O'Neill
Secretary
Department of Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20220
Dear Secretary O'Neill,
The "information exchange" schemes proposed by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and European Union pose a significant threat to America's competitive position in the global economy. Compared to Europe's welfare states, the United States is a low-tax economy, and this helps us attract jobs and capital.
I recognize that you have resisted these initiatives, but I am concerned that the Administration's opposition to tax harmonization is not sufficiently enthusiastic. To put my mind at ease, can you address the following issues:
The United States should never feel compelled to put another nation's laws above our own, and we should guard against international initiatives that create dangerous precedents. With this in mind, can you assure me that you agree that all nations have the right to determine their own domestic policies so long as they do not create a national security threat to other countries?
Do nations have the right to determine the tax treatment of income earned inside their borders? This question is important, as you will appreciate, because America is the world's largest beneficiary of international capital flows. Needless to say, the United States should determine how – and if – any resulting income is taxed.
A United Nations conference in mid-March will be considering proposals to boost foreign aid, including tax harmonization proposals such as information exchange, an International Tax Organization, and global taxes on energy and/or financial transactions. Can you assure me that the United States will block these proposals, all of which would undermine America's competitive advantage in the global economy?
As New Hampshire residents can attest, tax competition between states promotes fiscal responsibility and rewards free-market economic policy. But politicians from the European welfare states promoting tax harmonization argue that individuals should not be allowed to lower their tax bills by shifting resources to lower-tax jurisdictions. Isn't this mentality inconsistent with conservative principles?
I look forward to specific answers to these important questions. Thank you for your attention to this critical issue.
Sincerely,
Bob Smith
U.S. Senator
More information at these sites: http://www.americanpolicycenter.org/un/globaltreaties.htm
http://www.newscorridor.com/columnnists/caruba/2002columns/carubacolumn031202.htm
http://wwwsyninfo.com/PRIVATE/2001/11/21/200112110543541.htm
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/3/12/646434.shtml
And here is a United Nations report exploring what to tax and how to make global taxation more palatable to the suckers.
http:/www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/ffd/2001/wahlberg.htm