Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Demidog
RG won't mention that the state was moving to permanently remove the children even though there were no convictions obtained.

Didn't the state send the children to Ruth's parents?

23 posted on 04/13/2002 8:40:56 AM PDT by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: TruthWillWin
Didn't the state send the children to Ruth's parents?

Not in the beginning. They placed them in foster care and denied the Christines visitation for 8 months even after the Christine's obtained a court order. The state abusers determined that visitation wasn't a good idea and was "traumatic" to the children given the tearful goodbyes.

It was only when the state threatened to terminate their parental rights permanently that the Christines acted to take their children back by force which was exactly the manner in which they were taken from them.

24 posted on 04/13/2002 8:46:23 AM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson