Hmm. Sharon fighting terrorism "creates" more Saddam's and Ayatollahs? So it should stand to reason that our actions against Al Qaeda and The Taliban do as well, should they not?
And I notice how you don't believe that we should be truly uninvolved, but rather come down hard on Israel, and for doing, what? Well, doing what we are doing. Like I said that's called hypocrisy, it's shameful. But I guess I have it all upside down you see I'd rather be a neo-con than a neo-Clinton. silly me.
Like I asked before, if Hitler had oil, how much oil would it take to give him your blessing when he fires up the ovens, what 1 million, two maybe?
You see it might be in my "best interest" to look the other way, or slam the good guys to get something from the bad guys, but its, wrong. It also might be in my "best interest" to take money from another person, but it's wrong. And it might even be in my best interest to lie and cheat, but again, it's wrong.
And it might appease the neonazi ragheads to throw Israel under the bus for doing what we are doing (although I think not, they need our money more than we need their oil, and they will hate us no matter what we do) but it's, guess what??? wrong, wrong, wrong.
It's not about putting Israel first, It's about putting one's conscience first. But then I guess that's just a neo-con thang I wouldn't necessarily expect you to understand.