Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConsistentLibertarian
"I take it you're conceding the point then: This judge has no biblical authority for his medical diagnosis."

Yes, the judge did overstep the bounds with the "medical" opinion from scripture, I agree.
Had he held an opinion from medical personnel, that would have been helpful to his arguement, but then based on the support of scripture stating homosexuality is detrimental to society, he offered an opinion for those to seek help - same as if an alcoholic or drug abuser would come before his bench and be told to seek help with their problem....
Az

17 posted on 04/13/2002 4:49:09 AM PDT by azhenfud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: azhenfud
Failure to understand what could possibly count as evidence for a claim is a worrisome trait in a judge.
19 posted on 04/13/2002 4:51:52 AM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson