Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big Jump in Spending Marks 2003 Budget
The Washington Post ^ | 04/15/2002 | By Glenn Kessler

Posted on 04/14/2002 8:55:44 PM PDT by dts32041

Edited on 09/03/2002 4:50:18 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: texlok
... the emergence of budget surpluses led directly to the spending growth. "It is really obvious that when there is money around, they will spend it, even if they are Republicans," ...

So true. Remember Lott putting into the budget ships the Navy didn't want? Remember Gingrich putting into the budget airplanes the Air Force didn't want? Now Bush is doing stuff like trying to get taxpayers to assume payment of steelworker pensions instead of having steel companies fulfill their obligation. The sad truth is that nobody in Washington cares for the nation's financial health. Vote-buying for re-election is their only concern. A pox on them all!

41 posted on 04/15/2002 7:33:22 AM PDT by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: texlok
I'm just bothered by the fact that I voted for Bush and got Gore instead.

Well said. I hope the White House reads this thread.

42 posted on 04/15/2002 7:37:53 AM PDT by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Satadru
I'm sorry, I should have turned the </sarcasm flag on.
43 posted on 04/15/2002 7:41:20 AM PDT by gunshy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Nothing worse than the Discovery Channel.
44 posted on 04/15/2002 7:52:02 AM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
"War , Safety Cost = $$$$$$$......freedom doesn't come cheap......"

Hmm. Can you buy more freedom by paying more taxes and borrowing more money?

Is there a point of diminishing returns?

Citing the phrase "freedom doesn't come cheap" as justification for an even bigger government than the one we have is, frankly, Orwellian doublespeak.

45 posted on 04/15/2002 7:53:23 AM PDT by Tauzero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
"Kind of makes you wonder what the first 2 trillion was for. If 2 trillion could not buy us safety how will 2.4 trillion?"

Spot on!

46 posted on 04/15/2002 7:54:33 AM PDT by Tauzero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rightuvu
"Otherwise, how can we spend more with less coming in?"

That's easy! Print greenbacks.

Oh wait, that's a tax too, on all holders of dollars...

47 posted on 04/15/2002 7:57:53 AM PDT by Tauzero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
And I should do that why?
48 posted on 04/15/2002 8:33:02 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: texlok
"I just don't understand. He did a pretty good job in Texas."

That is a popular myth. He surrendered to the Democrats on every important issue. Even his so-called "largest tax-cut in TX history" was an illusion. The appraisal districts inflated valuation and localities accepted larger tax burdens in exchange for higher local rates. Under Bush, total tax takes by governments in Texas increased. There was no tax cut for tax payers. Same old recycled crap peddled by the Democrats, we had a decrease in the rate of the increase and they called it a tax cut. Read my lips, "Bush is not a conservative." Bush makes noises like a conservative, and then enlarges government and takes away liberties.

The only reason to even consider cutting Bush some slack, is competence. Not his; his cabinet's. Bush has assembled and extremely capable cabinet. Over time this cabinet could end up giving him a present of a great Presidency. I still think Bush, et al should have a tremendous shock and great awakening. I would consider a serious defeat in the off year elections just the right medicine to focus his cabinet, advisors and Congress on the 2004 elections. Repeating 1994 combined the current administration could do wonders for America. Without a 2x4 between the eyes, I don't think we are going to change the administration's focus or that of Congressional Republicans. Losing control of Congress to the Democrats is risky, but I think it poses less risk than the path we are on.

49 posted on 04/15/2002 9:58:14 AM PDT by B. A. Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rightuvu
"Correct me if I'm wrong: Doesn't an increase in government expenditures (the largest such increase since the liberal "Great Society") mean that taxes have to go UP, not down?"

Good question. I have wondered how long the policy of spend and barrow can go on. The interest on the debt breaks out to $50 per week per tax payer now.
50 posted on 04/15/2002 10:35:16 AM PDT by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rightwing2
What happened to smaller goverment, less spending? It seems as though, Bush has forgotten nearly all the conservative agenda.
51 posted on 04/15/2002 10:39:54 AM PDT by brneyedgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: brneyedgirl
I live in an area of the country where unemployment is still high. This morning on the local news a man being interviewed regarding the job market recommended the government as the sector creating new jobs.
52 posted on 04/15/2002 10:48:37 AM PDT by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: brneyedgirl
Bush is just stealing another Democrat issue, big government, pretty soon the democrats will not have any issues left to run against Bush on. Now this is great if you are a Bushy and don't give a damn about anything other then seening Bush win the next election, but if you kinda hoped for a conservative president, well you are screwed.
53 posted on 04/15/2002 12:38:29 PM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: B. A. Conservative
The only reason to even consider cutting Bush some slack, is competence. Not his; his cabinet's. Bush has assembled and extremely capable cabinet. Over time this cabinet could end up giving him a present of a great Presidency.

If he runs this country into the ground and destroys the Constitution in the process, it's a moot point.

Losing control of Congress to the Democrats is risky, but I think it poses less risk than the path we are on.

I'm shocked to hear myself say this, but I'd actually prefer a democrat congress with Bush in the WH. There's got to be some balance. If playing the race card to stop implementation of a national ID or roadblocks or federal security chiefs everywhere works, then let's play that baby. We are literally getting into which is the lesser of two evils.

Putting aside 9/11, but not the resulting legislation, I can honestly say we are worse off than we were a year ago. We are a bit less freer than we were (and Lord help us if a liberal gets into office with the PATRIOT ACT still in effect). Government has grown bigger for no discernable reason. We gave billions to the airline industry, which was in trouble long before 9/11. We have sold the Israeli's out practically, we are cutting terrorists (Hamas/PLO/Saudis) a helluva lot of slack. We are using the Drugs=Terrorism ads to take the focus off of the fact that much of the money for terrorism is flowing out of Saudi Arabia, and not from some crackhead passed out on a park bench. We are welcoming the illegal aliens with open arms.

Is there a light at the end of the tunnel?

54 posted on 04/15/2002 4:25:56 PM PDT by texlok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
Now this is great if you are a Bushy and don't give a damn about anything other then seening Bush win the next election, but if you kinda hoped for a conservative president, well you are screwed.

That's the problem. we are screwed. I just hope that he does enough damage to cause a serious conservative contender to come forward for 2004, but not enough damage that it's irreversable.

55 posted on 04/15/2002 4:27:16 PM PDT by texlok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: texlok
"Is there a light at the end of the tunnel?"

I don't know for sure, but we are looking for it, here and here

56 posted on 04/17/2002 7:26:01 AM PDT by B. A. Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson