Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gumbo
I wonder if objective investigators could determine whether this miraculous turtle actually came from Mr. Maier's land, e.g., through soil analysis.

Maybe they could if they can find it! That's the outrageous part. The only evidence that this turtle ever existed at this location is the recollection of the person who reported it and the notation in his log. There is no turtle to test because nobody except Mr. Angus ever saw the turtle!

The DEP deputized these enviro-troopers and then gives them a tremendous amount of unchecked power. A notation in the log book, and suddenly part of your land is off limits. It is not the duty of the enviro-trooper to demonstrate that his findings are true. All he has to do is report them. And now the state is providing Mr. Angus' defense!

6 posted on 04/15/2002 10:59:56 AM PDT by gridlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: gridlock
You're probably right. I've read and re-read the article, trying to find out what Mr. Angus DID with the putative turtle, but can't find anything there.

I'm going to email the reporter and ask if he knows what the claim is - will post his answer if he replies.

Another galling thing: We the taxpayers are paying for Angus's defense. (Thanks to decision by Gov. McGreevey's attorney general.) On what grounds, I wonder, was THAT decision made?

7 posted on 04/15/2002 4:01:12 PM PDT by gumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson