Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/15/2002 10:42:36 AM PDT by alexandria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: alexandria
it is in "Richard III" that one can learn most from characters who see evil, yet freeze at the key moment. The principal characters are fully aware of Richard's undeniable evil, yet they let him have his way despite themselves. Richard is the most systematically evil character in all of Shakespeare's plays. "I can smile, and murder while I smile," he says, swearing that he will outdo all the villains of history "and set the murderous Machiavel to school."

A deep insight.

The most important thing Richard knows is that while conscience allows us to understand ordinary crimes, it actually blinds us before the most extraordinary ones. The idea that conscience blinds us, making us less able to oppose evil's most brazen forms, is deeply disturbing, for conscience is the sine qua non of civil society. Conscience is supposed to be the faculty that helps us become aware of our effects on others and our motives towards them, notably our baser motives. In Elizabethan English, "conscience" is an equivocal word that can mean either that faculty that allows us to feel guilt or "awareness," as in "consciousness." When Hamlet says, "Conscience does make cowards of us all," he means consciousness, by making us aware of the possibility of death, makes us cowardly.

2 posted on 04/15/2002 10:52:16 AM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alexandria; robbys; dennisw; veronica
The problem so eloquently described in this article can be summed up very simply - the failure to confront and destroy evil is the result of moral cowardice.

This is a problem far older than Shakepeare, having shown up in the Bible. Israel's first King, Saul, is eventually deposed by G-d because he failed to destroy Amalek completely. King David, Saul's successor, even had the same problem - though in the end he acted to obey G-d's command. Both were afraid of what we would call "public opinion," as are so many modern politicians. One would hope that a man who claims such moral clarity as Bush would act deceisively to crush evil on more than a selective basis.

4 posted on 04/15/2002 11:28:35 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Onyx; Alouette; Lent; Knighthawk; a_Turk, Dennisw; Pokey78,College Repub,SJackson; Torie; Yehuda...
A great article.
6 posted on 04/15/2002 11:51:26 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alexandria
BUMP
23 posted on 05/02/2002 5:39:32 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alexandria
BUMP
26 posted on 05/03/2002 4:03:06 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: alexandria

B I L L C L I N T O N L E G A C Y


29 posted on 05/07/2002 8:23:20 AM PDT by Stallone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson