Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/16/2002 3:45:35 PM PDT by NorCoGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: NorCoGOP
even the most twisted sadists don't have the heart to seem him lose again.

Run Al, Run!

2 posted on 04/16/2002 3:47:17 PM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
It's indeed a twisted sadist who would inflict Al Gore on this country as it's President.
4 posted on 04/16/2002 3:50:03 PM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
Heeheeheeheeheehee...
7 posted on 04/16/2002 3:53:58 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
Gore can't win, so Democrats should save the man from himself.

The core of our problems right there, in a nut shell. The writer feels that rats, in general, know what's best for everyone and aren't timid about transforming their "mother knows best" attitude into policy either.

I'd rather see Gore run on his own ability/virtue (if he's got any that is) than see the rats keep him from running just to spare his feelers.

EBUCK

9 posted on 04/16/2002 3:57:00 PM PDT by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
Gore returned there on Saturday, taking numerous verbal swipes at the sitting president, calling the GOP "the pirates of Enron."

Pathetic...

12 posted on 04/16/2002 3:59:54 PM PDT by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
His die-hard supporters may go to their graves defending the Tennessee native...

Notice the writer wisely avoids the claim that anyone in Tennessee is defending loserman Gore.

13 posted on 04/16/2002 4:01:13 PM PDT by hillsborofox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
I heard Gore looked like a loser, prespiring all over.
15 posted on 04/16/2002 4:02:42 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
"the pirates of Enron."

It's the Crimson Permanent Assurance!

21 posted on 04/16/2002 4:15:52 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
I wouldn't be quite so complacent, folks. A Democrat has a shot at the White House in 2004. Not a very good one at the moment, granted, but just like the War on Terrorism, we should not allow ourselves to go mushy and complacent because we're doing well now.

D

22 posted on 04/16/2002 4:16:00 PM PDT by daviddennis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
So why nominate Gore and wish an even crueler fate on the man who suffered the disappointment of the narrowest presidential loss ever?

Why? For the pure joy of watching him lose by a LANDSLIDE in 2004.

He nearly STOLE the election in 2000; but by the grace of God, he LOST in spite of the RATS felonious efforts.

I want to see him and his goons utterly demolished in 2004.

24 posted on 04/16/2002 4:18:29 PM PDT by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
The zombie algore is lost without a political office. He can't even earn a living on his own. I think that he really wants to run but probably won't. Like Hitlery, he's now not going to run for anything unless it is a sure thing. Another defent would push him over the edge.

Richard W.

25 posted on 04/16/2002 4:26:50 PM PDT by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
And this came from a U.of U, leftist student paper!? Can you possibly believe that "Gore fought the good fight"? HUH? Gore showed himself to be a nasty and ridiculous contender who lost in spite of his machinations and those of the RATs in FL who attempted to steal the election with hanging chads.
26 posted on 04/16/2002 4:27:24 PM PDT by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
Kinda reminds me of a sign I made up for a pro-Bush rally after the 2000 election..."Resistance is Futile, Concede Algore!"
28 posted on 04/16/2002 4:39:06 PM PDT by Preech1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
Clean shaven and sharp-tongued,

And bloated. You left out bloated.

29 posted on 04/16/2002 4:41:01 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
From the article: "Florida, you'll recall, kept the 2000 presidential election hanging in the balance for weeks before George W. Bush's 537-vote margin finally became official. "

What tripe! GORE kept the 2000 presidential election hanging in the balance.

Imagine if Gore did run in 2004 and suffered a landslide loss evidenced by national maps depicted solidly in red. Imagine now that Gore calls to concede.

"Who did you say is calling? Oh, I'm sorry, Mr. Gore, but the President isn't taking any calls this evening."

33 posted on 04/16/2002 5:00:01 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
Clean shaven and sharp-tongued, Al Gore, and sweating profusely . . .
Someone should tell him to keep his suitcoat on.
35 posted on 04/16/2002 5:14:39 PM PDT by Marianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
Gore in 4. It has a rhyme to it. The anti-reverend likes rhymes.
41 posted on 04/16/2002 5:50:49 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
Gore's opponent bumbled and misspoke his way through a painfully inarticulate campaign, presenting himself as an oblivious and overpriced dolt.

The liberals have *really* got to stop believing their own propaganda.

46 posted on 04/16/2002 6:31:42 PM PDT by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
Well uhhhhhhhhhh duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh
50 posted on 04/16/2002 7:08:05 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
It wouldn't be such a big deal of Mr. Gore didn't take himself so seriously.

And for the record, the Supreme Court didn't decide the election, the Electoral College did. The Supreme Court simply ruled that the law, as written and in effect at the time of the election, must be obeyed. Hardly the "constitutional crisis" it was billed as being.

Imal

51 posted on 04/16/2002 7:17:20 PM PDT by Imal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson