[Mark Bahner]

His words don't seem to match his actions.

Perhaps like G.W. Bush making an oath on the Bible to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States"...and then signing into law that blatantly violates the First Amendment?

Which of those instances is worse, in terms of "words not matching actions"? A violation of an oath (on a Bible) to follow The Law? Or a vote to change a law that shouldn't even be on the books in the first place? (As any person who truly values liberty will tell you, there should be no numerical limits on immigration.)

[Roscoe]

Translation: You can't explain Ron Paul's hypocrisy on the issue, so you want to change the subject.

[Mark Bahner]

Perhaps like G.W. Bush making an oath on the Bible to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States"...and then signing into law that blatantly violates the First Amendment?

Oops...I left out two words:

Perhaps like G.W. Bush making an oath on the Bible to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States"...and then signing into law a bill that blatantly violates the First Amendment?

(I assume everyone understands this as a thinly veiled reference to the campaign finance reform law.)