Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A TIME FOR CAUTION
Crisis Magazine ^ | April 18, 2002 | Deal Hudson

Posted on 04/18/2002 6:05:05 AM PDT by NYer

A Time for Caution

by Deal Hudson, Editor of Crisis Magazine

Passions are running high in response to the daily revelations of sexual misconduct by Catholic priests. I purposely avoid the word "pedophilia" because-in the rush to judgment-most of the instances of "sexual abuse" are being reported incorrectly as pedophilia.

Pedophilia is sexual contact with a child who has not yet reached puberty, say before age thirteen. Sexual relations with older adolescents past puberty is accurately termed "hebophilia" or "ephebophilia."

Why is the distinction important?

The presence of pedophiles in the priesthood describes a group of psychologically disordered men who can be found among any group. Married men with children, for example, have more than a 3% likelihood of being pedophiles.

However, one group of men has a markedly higher percentage of pedophiles-homosexual men.

Homosexual males are more likely than heterosexuals to engage in sex with minors. One study shows that homosexuals are three times more likely than straight men to engage in adult-child sexual relations. Other studies demonstrate that 35% of all pedophiles are homosexual (see http://www.narth.com/docs/pedophNEW.html).

Most of the reported instances of priests having sexual contact are with teenage boys, and points in an obvious direction: There are a lot of homosexuals in the priesthood. And some of these homosexual priests are responsible for the alarming numbers of sexual misconduct among the clergy.

The secular media will avoid this conclusion. Its editorial bias will keep any fingers from being pointed in the direction of homosexuality. The "problem of pedophilia" will be the ongoing refrain with the solution somehow being found in a married or female clergy. All the while, a major facet of the problem will be ignored.

Others have already said that the encouragement of sexual activity among married priests is the strangest of all remedies for pedophilia - as if married sex will drive out pedophiliac desires!

But there's a caution in this. In addressing the significant homosexual subculture in the Catholic clergy, we need to avoid at all costs a witch-hunt for homosexual priests.

Clearly, homosexuality does not necessarily lead to pedophilia or hebophilia. There are many instances, I believe, of homosexually disposed persons living chaste lives of heroic self-command. They may well be living among our priests.

To address the situation squarely the Church will have to submit itself to a rigorous investigation of homosexuality and the priesthood. This process should be undertaken in a measured and methodical way, with laypeople with genuine expertise in the areas of personnel management and sexual disorders.

Some in the Vatican have already gone on record saying that homosexuals shouldn't be ordained at all. What happens if the Church reaches this as an official conclusion? Will it mean that all priests with homosexual inclinations are invalidly ordained? Will some Catholics actively demand they "out" themselves and "resign" their priesthood?

I raise these questions as a note of caution. Catholics are feeling scandalized. We're looking for answers and explanations. We also want solutions and reforms. I recommend all of us look down the road a distance before we allow our present passions to make the damage worse than it already is.

Deal W. Hudson is publisher and editor of CRISIS Magazine, a Catholic monthly published in Washington, DC. His articles and comments have been published in The Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Washington Post, Washington Times, Los Angeles Times, National Review, Richmond Times-Dispatch, The Village Voice, Roll Call, National Journal, The Economist, and by the Associated Press. He appears regularly on television shows such as NBC Nightly News, One-on One with John McLaughlin, C-Span's Washington Journal, News Talk, NET's Capitol Watch, The Beltway Boys, The Religion and Ethics Newsweekly on PBS, and radio programs such as "All Things Considered" on National Public Radio. He was associate professor of Philosophy at Fordham University from 1989 to 1995 and was a visiting professor at New York University for five years. He taught for nine years at Mercer University in Atlanta, where he was chair of the philosophy department. He has published many reviews and articles as well as four books: Understanding Maritain: Philosopher and Friend (Mercer, 1988); The Future of Thomism (Notre Dame, 1992); Sigrid Undset On Saints and Sinners (Ignatius, 1994); and Happiness and the Limits of Satisfaction (Rowman & Littlefield, 1996).


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: catholic; homosexual; pedophiles; priests
The secular media will avoid this conclusion.

You think?

1 posted on 04/18/2002 6:05:06 AM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NYer
>I raise these questions as a note of caution. Catholics are feeling scandalized. We're looking for answers and explanations. We also want solutions and reforms. I recommend all of us look down the road a distance before we allow our present passions to make the damage worse than it already is.

Right now, all three major religions are under attack. Just yesterday I did a thread, where I started:

But, as we try to figure out what's going on in the world, think of this bit of strangeness:
1) The Western Establishment is at war with "radical" Islam for fomenting terrorism...

2) The Western Establishment is at war with the Catholic Church for tacitly accepting pedophilia...

3) The Western Establishment is at war with Israel for oppressing those poor Arabs...
The Western Establishment has found reasons for being at war with the world's three biggest religions.

Imagine the context wasn't world events, but the business world. Imagine first ABC found itself under financial attack. Then CBS found itself under financial attack. Then NBC found itself under financial attack. Would anyone assume it was "random events" hitting three similar targets at once? Wouldn't everyone be looking for some power bloc which would stand to benefit from the battle?

Hasn't the destruction of religion been an agenda item for one or two (in)famous global movements?!

[House Wants Clergy Housing Bill (The Hot War Against Religion) ]

I think now would be a good time to question all our passions, and try to see if there is a "bigger picture" around each of these individual "wars."

Mark W.

2 posted on 04/18/2002 10:16:10 AM PDT by MarkWar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
>Some in the Vatican have already gone on record saying that homosexuals shouldn't be ordained at all. What happens if the Church reaches this as an official conclusion? Will it mean that all priests with homosexual inclinations are invalidly ordained? Will some Catholics actively demand they "out" themselves and "resign" their priesthood? < Mr. Deal asks an interesting question. The answer is - there is already a 1961 law, still ineffect, prohibiting homosexual men from being ordained. (Talk about "going on the record")

We don't need new laws, we need Bishops that will adhere to laws already on the books. It seems the essence of common sense that homosexuals ought to be excluded from Ordination. Good Lord, I feel like I am SO out of touch with modernity. Benedicamus Domino.

3 posted on 04/18/2002 10:33:56 AM PDT by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkWar
"The Western Establishment has found reasons for being at war with the world's three biggest religions."

"Hasn't the destruction of religion been an agenda item for one or two (in)famous global movements?!"

Someone posted recently on one of the threads here that Hillary Clinton did her senior paper in college on Antonio Gramsci and that info certainly is an aftershock from the last decade.

Is it possible that back in the 30's when the higher education system was invaded by those with socialist views that another institution was systematically invaded in such a quiet manner as to elude the recognition of the hierarchy of that day? Unfortunately hindsight can be more in focus than the present or the future.
4 posted on 04/18/2002 10:59:31 AM PDT by Domestic Church
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson