You'd think his lawyer would have gotten it right and just called it "discrimination".
Note to self: L.A. Times is still full of self-hatred for their sorry white selves.
This is true, there area lot of victims of Reverse discrimination out there who are disgruntled
He added, "I thought it was unfortunate that we didn't have a more diverse jury." There was only one black juror.
Yes, it would be more fair if there had been a jury full of NAACP members. They would have been much more unbiased.
This is a case of discrimination, there's no "reverse" about it.
Isn't it ironic how the very people who decry racism the loudest tend to be the worst offenders? State-sponsored racism dictates that it's okay if you do it against a white guy.
"Disgruntled city employees." I guess that's one term for the other people who are also victims of government-sponsored racism.
Broadcasting live RIGHT NOW! "Trueblackman" will be broadcasting his inaugural show on RadioFR! Tonight it's a FREEPFORALL! TBM will be discussing several current issues! Call in with your questions and topics!
I dentity politics is the death of this nation, so naturally it makes me happy when I see the rules reversed and applied uniformly.
How true. Didn't OJ Simpson teach us that blacks will always rule in favor of blacks regardless of the evidence in the case.
Can you imagine the reverse, if in a discrimination suit against blacks one of the attorneys lamented that there werent more whites on the jury. The media would have a heart attack.
Oh my, heaven forbid that actual TESTIMONY could influence a jury!
Dang, we must all figure out ways to eliminate those pesky WITNESSES, and, for that matter, those old tired, out of date JURIES from the progressive modern liberal communist justice "system" in which the down trodden great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great, great grandsons and daughters of the wonderfully diverse, culturally rich and rewarding, highly successful African homelanders that saw fit to sell there own neighbors and in some cases family members into slavery, can be dutifully rewarded with discriminatory advancement over members of an obviously unsuccessful descendants of western European areas so as to enable the superior abilities of the former mentioned individuals for the greater good of all the incapable later mentioned individuals by guiding them to greater heights of moral behavior in their every day lives by which.... bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla...
utter journalistic commie vomit.... plain and simple.
Assuming we are stuck with this kind of obscene, institutionalized-racism law, shouldn't that headline read:
Police Officer Wins Job Bias Suit
Wins Discrimination Suit?
BREAKING: Today's Forecast for Miami : SNOW
I'm of chinese descent and when the japanese reparations came out, I thought, "this is not good" because I thought other repartions would follow. Although the interred suffered and lost their property, and reparations were limited to those actually interred and not their descendants, and the reparations were certainly deserved, I thought this still was a bad idea.
Although this guy is seems deserving, it may be the harbinger of bad things to come.
Here's what I just wrote to ABC:
Since when is racism against white people "Reverse Discrimination"? "Racial discrimination" is "Racial discrimination." Period.
Unfortunately, in keeping with typical Left-wing tradition of ABC, your choice of headline for the report is a simple display of irony and obliviousness about your own contributions to it.
Although these outrages occur on an almost hourly basis at ABC, this one really does take the cake.
(BTW, should I have used "oblivion" instead of "obliviousness"? If so, I daresay it's too late, now, anyway...heh heh heh...)