1 posted on
04/21/2002 7:25:43 AM PDT by
LarryLied
To: LarryLied
Gay marriage issue divides Democrats...and it won't cause any less confusion and discord among "Republicans" these days, either. RINOs appear to be nearing majority status, and are no less infected with a severe case of moral relativism than the worthy opposition.
2 posted on
04/21/2002 7:32:32 AM PDT by
MarineDad
To: LarryLied
"I am sick and tired of homophobic demagogues inflaming anti-gay passions while masquerading as concerned Christian marriage advocates," Hinkley said. "From my perspective, the debate needs to be reframed so that people understand it's about rights." And I'm sick and tired of heterophobic demagogues inflaming homosexual passions while masquerading as concerned for civil rights. From my perspective, the debate needs to be reframed so that people understand it's about defining marriage as we have for millenia for the good of society.
To: LarryLied
If the definition of marriage is broadened on the basis of human rights, wouldn't it be a violation of human rights if, for example, two women and one man or two men and one woman want to be married?
6 posted on
04/21/2002 8:26:37 AM PDT by
randita
To: LarryLied
Would McCain and Hillary qualify as having a gay marriage?
23 posted on
04/21/2002 9:54:30 AM PDT by
Piquaboy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson