Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
The desire to have children is not necessarily heterosexual; that the author of this article generalizes entire populations like this points to his/her credibility. Regardless, I don't see how your long-winded and sometimes irrelevent "post" (did you even write this yourself?) negates Equal Protection.
18 posted on 04/21/2002 9:38:16 AM PDT by strictconstruct
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: strictconstruct
The desire to have children is not necessarily heterosexual; that the author of this article generalizes entire populations like this points to his/her credibility.

How so? You can deny, but offer nothing else. Where's your argument?

Regardless, I don't see how your long-winded and sometimes irrelevent "post" (did you even write this yourself? ans. yes) negates Equal Protection.

Equal protection applies to individuals, not couples or groups...

Equal protection is defined as an individual right, not a collective one.

28 posted on 04/21/2002 10:21:52 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson