Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ALOHA RONNIE
While I agree that his tenure here in LA has been horrible, at least give him some credit for deciding not to sue the city for his own performance issues.
At least that shows some tiny degree of character.
8 posted on 04/22/2002 3:34:00 PM PDT by mgstarr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mgstarr
...Perhaps PARKS did not really have a legal leg to stand on in any lawsuit against a City Government that he now wants to become of an elected part of representing the only people in the City of Los Angeles who wanted him back a LAPD Chief...?
13 posted on 04/22/2002 4:08:01 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr
I'd have given him that respect if he would have expressed his desire to stay on, then accepted the decision without taking it to the City Council. After five years, you've either shown your capabilities or you haven't. He hadn't. It was time for him to go. He didn't do it with grace. IMO

He was doing the typical shooting off the mouth routine that's become the norm for a member of a minority when it's time to gracefully bow out. Again, IMO.

14 posted on 04/22/2002 4:09:41 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr
While I agree that his tenure here in LA has been horrible, at least give him some credit for deciding not to sue the city for his own performance issues. At least that shows some tiny degree of character.

That's being overly generous. It merely shows that his legal position was so weak that even Gloria Allred had doubts that they could successfully extort a payoff from the city council and mayor. I thought Allred and Parks would try anyway.

Given Parks' surprising decision not to sue, his early resignation makes sense. For one thing, by forcing the city to scramble for an interim chief and speed up its selection timetable, it is a tiny bit of payback. (While it's amusing to contemplate the thought of suing Parks for breach of contract, from a political viewpoint it's absurd. After Los Angeles had unequivocally repudiated Parks' leadership, to say the city needs him so much it is willing to sue to keep him on the job for another four months would make a laughingstock out of city officials. And they're a big enough laughingstock as it is.) For another thing, Parks is trying to play the role of noble victim, leaving with his dignity intact so he can fight again some other day rather than being dragged out kicking and whinging.

If Parks had accepted the original decision with a stiff upper lip, that might have been evidence of character. This is just politics.

24 posted on 04/22/2002 5:18:31 PM PDT by dpwiener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson