I didn't claim that Roed-Larsen's observations alone are sufficient evidence of a massacre. There should be a full investigation to determine the facts and uncover any evidence of crimes, including massacres. How scientific is your unseemly haste to exonerate Israel in advance of a thorough investigation?
I didn't claim that Roed-Larsen's observations alone are sufficient evidence of a massacre. There should be a full investigation to determine the facts and uncover any evidence of crimes, including massacres. How scientific is your unseemly haste to exonerate Israel in advance of a thorough investigation?It is the same 'unseemly haste' I exhibited when Cynthia McKinney suggested we investigate George W. Bush since there was no evidence that he knew about 9/11 -- and profited from it -- in advance. But, she added, if we investigated, we might find evidence that he had foreknowledge.
Same motivation. Scurrilous charges should have something more solid than a few arm-flailing political opponents hyperventilating.
But hey, if an impartial team went in, I wouldn't have as much problem with it. But even YOU must admit the UN is *not* impartial. Not about Israel.