Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 7.63Broom
You mentioned "anti-AWB scrutiny". Who will provide this scrutiny and how do you expect it to be disseminated?

The plaintiffs in this court case. Further dissemination is irrelevant at this level.

I don't see the Feds giving up this power.

I don't see the current Feds keeping this power regardless. This administration is incapable of producing the kind of FUD (fear, uncertainty, doubt) via rabid obfuscations necessary to fight the legal facts involved in this case.

47 posted on 05/01/2002 11:13:02 AM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2
The plaintiffs in this court case. Further dissemination is irrelevant at this level.

My question exposed my ignorance. I went back and re-read the article and have a better understanding of the proceedings. I'm going to cross my fingers and hope for the best (ignoring that nagging doubt). Thanks for the polite "education".

49 posted on 05/01/2002 11:29:05 AM PDT by 7.63Broom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson