[DoughtyOne]

Which is harder to believe, that TWA 800's fuel tank overheated on a 70 degree day, when TWA 747s sit on the tarmac in the middle-east on 130 degree days and don't?, or that upwards of 200 people suffered a common mass halucination lasting for five to thirty seconds? The plane didn't overheat. The TWA 800 was knocked out of the sky by a missile. Those who fought to bring the truth to light didn't make big bucks off this. What was their motive to lie?

[pa_dweller]

Here's what I consider to be indirect, but damning, evidence of something mighty rotten in this whole thing.

From What Really Happened

As to the plane, it was not particularly old and certainly no more explosive than the average 747. If the NTSB had believed what Goelz has said, they would have recalled those planes quicker than you could say "Firestone." Ask the machinist's union. Ask any TWA pilot. Ask a Boeing engineer. After spending $40 million, the NTSB was unable to identify a scenario that would allow the plane to blow up.

The potential damage caused by the truth about this appalling event coming out must be grave in the extreme. Just MHO.

[wtc911]

My wife, brother, sister and I all know people who saw the track going up and then the explosion. These are all sober, mature people with no ax to grind. They know what they saw.

[Asmodeus]

If you know of anyone who has accused "upwards of 200 people of suffering a common mass halucination lasting for five to thirty seconds", please provide us all with their name(s) and your supporting reference URL's.

Truth is always dependent on facts - not suspicions, speculations, allegations or accusations.