Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Minister flees questioning authorities
AP Wire | May 1, 2002 | AP News Staff

Posted on 05/01/2002 6:31:25 AM PDT by NYer

SYRACUSE, N.Y. (AP) _ A Baptist minister charged with sexual abuse escaped dozens of deputies who surrounded his house only to be arrested early Wednesday at a local motel.

The Rev. David Gardiner was to be arraigned Wednesday in Salina Town Court on charges of sexual abuse and endangering the welfare of a child. Onondaga County Sheriff Kevin Walsh declined to provide details about the charges.

Gardiner, 42, is pastor of the Liverpool Baptist Church, a small congregation with about 50 members, said Greg Sigworth, the church's deacon.

Deputies went to Gardiner's home about 5 p.m. Tuesday to question him.

When deputies arrived, Gardiner, who was outside, ran into his home, which is connected to the church. He locked all the doors and refused to come out, Walsh said. ``We were going to talk to him about some crimes, and he ran into the house. Obviously, he didn't want to talk to us,'' Walsh said.

Walsh said Gardiner's 12-year-old son was inside the house but was napping and unaware of what was happening. When the boy awoke about 8:30 p.m., he came outside. Authorities finally stormed the house about 11 p.m. and discovered that Gardiner was gone.

A brief manhunt ended several hours later when Gardiner was found hiding out a Super 8 Motel in Liverpool, 6 miles northwest of Syracuse. ``We don't know exactly when he got out, but we believe it was before we surrounded the place,'' Walsh said.
AP-ES-05-01-02 0854EDT


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: baptist; church; pastor; sexualabuse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Notice the media used the term "sexual abuse" to describe the crime of this Baptist minister. Have they reserved "pedophile" for only the Roman collars?
1 posted on 05/01/2002 6:31:25 AM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NYer
Notice that he was arrested rather than transferred to a new playing field.
2 posted on 05/01/2002 6:34:35 AM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer, Freepaul
Why, when I saw the title, did I just know that this was going to turn into a denominational finger-pointing episode?
3 posted on 05/01/2002 6:49:50 AM PDT by kezekiel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
And how many times was he transferred before he was turned in? Did the parents have to sue first? Are church authorities blaming the victim (like Law)?
4 posted on 05/01/2002 6:57:22 AM PDT by joathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Here we have a minister running away from arrest on sexual abuse charges. THAT makes a great impression on our presumption of his innocence, doesn't it?

Maybe he ran because, as a Baptist, he couldn't count on having Cardinal Law behind him, covering his tracks.

5 posted on 05/01/2002 7:07:55 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Notice the media used the term "sexual abuse" to describe the crime of this Baptist minister. Have they reserved "pedophile" for only the Roman collars?

No, a pedophile molests prepubescent children. Sexual abuse includes teens.

So9

6 posted on 05/01/2002 7:18:22 AM PDT by Servant of the Nine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
If only Baptist ministers were allowed to marry, this would never happen.
7 posted on 05/01/2002 7:38:52 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
If only Baptist ministers were allowed to marry, this would never happen.

Since forbidding to marry is explicitly identified in Scripture as a demonic doctrine (1 Timothy 4:1, 3), the better question is: If Baptists pleased demonic spirits by forbidding marriage, how many more sexual wrongs might occur?

Dan
Biblical Christianity message board

8 posted on 05/01/2002 7:46:31 AM PDT by BibChr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: joathome
Baptists don't transfer. The individual church hires its preacher.
9 posted on 05/01/2002 8:01:56 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: joathome
Baptists don't transfer their ministers. Each church conducts a search for a minister, and an investigation is (supposed to be) done of the prospective minister. My own minister has his own sort of 'insurance' that he takes with him whenever he meets with church members: he brings his little boy (usually) and one other church member (when his son is not available) with him *always*. Pretty smart move, if you ask me. Keeps him clear of acting on any temptation (he's not arrogant or self-righteous enough to claim that he's anything loftier than a mere sinning mortal) or anyone (small chance, but it still exists) who might misinterpret any of his actions. Dang, he even told me i was beautiful (with a witness present); but, sure wouldn't take him to task for that. It was an 'observation' of his; i could *twist* it into something more, but then, that would be bearing false witness against my neighbor.
10 posted on 05/01/2002 8:33:33 AM PDT by DontMessWithMyCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy; Nyer
I know they don't transfer. However, my point is made. The coverup in the Catholic Church is the greater part of the problem; if you can't trust the bishops to do the right thing, you can't trust any priest with your kids. Is he just another molester hiding behind the bishop's skirt? I learned this growing up in one of Gilbert Gauthe's churches a long, long time ago.
11 posted on 05/01/2002 8:46:49 AM PDT by joathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Actually, I was making a satirical point.

There is in fact no church that forbids marriage.

12 posted on 05/01/2002 8:52:34 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NYer
I wonder how a Church with 50 members supports a full-time minister? I'll bet these folks get squeezed by the deacons.
13 posted on 05/01/2002 8:53:03 AM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
There is in fact no church that forbids marriage

No Bible-believing Christian church (which should be, but isn't, a tautology), that's true.

Dan

14 posted on 05/01/2002 9:14:23 AM PDT by BibChr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Since forbidding to marry is explicitly identified in Scripture as a demonic doctrine (1 Timothy 4:1, 3),

Paul is instructing Timothy about the Gnostics, Marcionites, Encratites, Manicheans and other ancient heretics who condemned all marriage and the use of all meat because they believed that all flesh was from an evil source. Marriage is a Sacrament and may be partaken by any who have not freely chosen to live a life of celibacy. Scripture calls for all unmarried Christians to live celibate lives. How convenient that you take Scripture out of context and leave out the explanation, but that's par for the course for you.

15 posted on 05/01/2002 9:17:00 AM PDT by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SMEDLEYBUTLER
How convenient that you take Scripture out of context and leave out the explanation, but that's par for the course for you.

Thank you!

Here's the section:

Now the Spirit expressly says that in latter times some will depart from the faith, giving heed to deceiving spirits and doctrines of demons, 2 speaking lies in hypocrisy, having their own conscience seared with a hot iron, 3 forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from foods which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth. 4 For every creature of God is good, and nothing is to be refused if it is received with thanksgiving; 5 for it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.
1 Timothy 4:1-5
Did I quote inaccurately? How was it out of context? Where did you find "the explanation" that meant Paul didn't really mean what he said? How could Paul refer to Gnostics and others, when Gnosticism (etc.) is a second-century phenomenon? How is something that would not obtain for centuries the "context"? Why did this touch a nerve with you?

Dan
What Is Biblical Christianity?

16 posted on 05/01/2002 10:01:22 AM PDT by BibChr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
How could Paul refer to Gnostics and others, when Gnosticism (etc.) is a second-century phenomenon? How is something that would not obtain for centuries the "context"?

Gnosticism finds its origins beginning in 539 BC following Cyrus' entrance to Babylon. Gnosticism predates the second century and the efforts of Valentinus and Ptolemaeus by a minimum of six centuries. That is how and why Paul warned Timothy about them and other ancient heretics. Gnostics, Marcionites, Encratites, Manicheans and other heretical groups were of the present, not the future.

Your thinly veiled attack on clerical celibacy is contradicted by Pauls' Epistle to Timothy; along with his Epistle to the Corinthians and the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, not supported by it. Both Christ and Paul lauded celibacy as the ideal and the Apostles gave up everything, including wives, to follow Christ. If you really knew the Bible, as you repeatedly claim, you'd know that. However, all of us who have witnessed your attacks on Catholicism, know that you don't.

17 posted on 05/01/2002 10:32:54 AM PDT by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SMEDLEYBUTLER; OrthodoxPresbyterian
Utter nonsense, every word.

Read Dr. Edwin Yamauchi. Gnosticism per se did not arise until after the first century. Your sophistry is the same as saying that Christian Science began in the 15th century BC because it borrows a word or two from the Bible.

What is telling is that the direct quotation of the Bible by a free child of God so enrages you.

The Bible knows nothing of Christian "priests." Pastors explicitly are to be "husbands of one wife" (1 Timothy 3:1f.).

The Bible says forbidding to marry is a demonic doctrine. I threw the rock. You yelped. It would be more profitable if you sought your own heart as to why.

I would point out, too, that the Lord Jesus' call to repent and believe extends to you, as well. You can know the freedom and joy of being a child of God by the grace of God alone, through faith alone, as instructed by the Bible alone. Nothing external prevents you.

Dan

18 posted on 05/01/2002 10:45:05 AM PDT by BibChr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: joathome
We (Baptists, that is) don't have bishops. The 'hierarchy' doesn't get any higher than the Pastor of the Church...who is entirely accountable to the membership for any transgressions. By and large, Baptists are pretty darned fundamental, as far as adhering to the teachings in the Bible. This fellow is going to have no one to run to 'ceptin his family, if they will even want him in the end (rather, he'll more than likely be running from his congregation as they go to tar and feather his sorry butt (afterwards they'll forgive him). Btw, who is Gilbert Gauthe? I've never heard of him. Thanks.
19 posted on 05/01/2002 11:13:25 AM PDT by DontMessWithMyCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NYer
The Sinister Minister!
20 posted on 05/01/2002 11:14:49 AM PDT by Delbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson