Skip to comments.
Weather satellite scheduled to lift off:Launch is set for 2:54 a.m. from Vandenberg Air Force Base.
The Orange County Register ^
| May 3, 2002
| GARY ROBBINS
Posted on 05/03/2002 1:00:05 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Edited on 04/14/2004 10:05:10 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
NASA's Aqua satellite is scheduled to soar into orbit early Saturday, carrying instruments designed to significantly improve short- and mid-term weather forecasts and expand science's understanding of climate systems, particularly Earth's water cycles.
The $952 million spacecraft features a unique sounder that will take unprecedented temperature and humidity readings at various levels of the atmosphere.
(Excerpt) Read more at ocregister.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: datacollection; environment; globalwarming; soundertechnology; weathermodeling
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
expand science's understanding of climate systems I wonder if this satellite has any hidden and unknown "tests", ala the Lynx hairs, that will skew data to prove global warming.
2
posted on
05/03/2002 1:10:52 PM PDT
by
RJL
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Do these launches from Vandenberg violate California's new air quality standards?
3
posted on
05/03/2002 1:44:44 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
Do these launches from Vandenberg violate California's new air quality standards? I worked a mission a few years back that was delayed for weeks due to winds coming off the ocean. The "air quality standard" in question was possibility that the 50-lb covers for the air-lit solid rockets would land on Lompoc....
4
posted on
05/03/2002 1:53:14 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: r9etb
Okay, that kind of air quality concern I can understand. ;-)
5
posted on
05/03/2002 1:55:31 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: RJL
There is no need to skew weather data to prove global warming, as
all data conclusively proves the theory.
That's the beauty of it.
6
posted on
05/03/2002 1:56:17 PM PDT
by
dead
To: r9etb
To: RJL
well, 2:54 AM is a time when little attention would be present. after all, if nasa, etc wanted good pr, scheduling expensive flights when no one is assured to be present is the opposite of what smart folks do (and smart folks includes rocket scientists.) this is done for a reason, yet I'm sure it's just a coincindence.
8
posted on
05/03/2002 3:58:46 PM PDT
by
galt-jw
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson