Posted on 05/03/2002 4:09:07 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
Market WrapUp for the Week
Friday's Stock Market WrapUp I?m thinking about the well-coined phrase thrown around the financial markets these days. "What is the Smart Money doing versus the Dumb Money?" The implied representation of these two items is that the "Smart Money" is considered the institutions and insiders, while the "Dumb Money" refers to the individual investors. Today, in a report released by BCA Research in Montreal, insider buying and selling turned sharply negative last month. This report lends a view into what many analysts had feared for several weeks: the concern that many executives, particularly in the tech sector, are pessimistic about the economy?s strength and the future potential of their companies. Are these executives selling their shares in anticipation of a market retreat? Not according to the ones who are selling. Most executives, when asked, explain that the reason for selling was due to other factors. For instance, the need to cover a large tax bill from exercising options or because of the limitations as to when they are allowed to sell created a coincidence to the timing of the sale. However, in industries with a brighter outlook, you?ll find that insiders have been buying where the outlook is more positive. For example, there has been some very lucrative insider trades of late in the metals and mining stocks. Simply put, insiders are the smart one?s in this game and they buy and risk their personal capital when things are good. Long before the tough economic times of today, insider selling and buying was looked at as a very strong indication of what the companies? future held. But with today?s increasing emphasis on stock and stock option compensation packages, the pundits claim it has become ever so difficult to get read on the true meaning of an insider purchase or sale. I?d venture a guess that the meaning is still the same today as it was 10 years ago. In the financial markets this week, the Dow showed some strength on Tuesday and Wednesday but failed to hold those gains as the week wore on. For the week the Dow gained 1%. The NASDAQ continued to be the worst performer of the group as Microsoft and Intel weighed down the index, and finishing the week with a 3.1% loss, bringing its decline for the year to 17%. The worse-than-expected unemployment rate and slower-than-expected growth in service industries cast doubt on the strength of rebound in profits. The U.S. unemployment rate rose in April to 6%, the highest since 1994. The increase was accounted by the number of "new" people entering the workforce. Separately, an industry survey showed activity at retail, financial services and other non-manufacturing companies rose at a slower pace in April than March, signaling a weaker than forecast recovery from recession. Overseas Market Singapore's benchmark stock index gained for a third day after the government raised the city-state's 2002 growth forecast and said it is cutting income and corporate taxes. Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index rose 0.2% led by Citic Pacific Ltd. after Merrill Lynch & Co. upgraded its rating on the stock. Treasury Market © Copyright, Scott Middleton, May 3, 2002 Home l Broadcast l Storm Watch l Top 10 l Perspectives l Resource Center l Sitemap l About Us Archived WrapUps: Warning: Earnings l Pro Forma Economics
The material on this website has no regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any visitor. It is published solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments. References made to third parties are based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable but are not guaranteed as being accurate. Visitors should not regard it as a substitute for the exercise of their own judgment. Any opinions expressed in this site are subject to change without notice and Financial Sense is not under any obligation to update or keep current the information contained herein. PFS Group and its respective officers and associates or clients may have an interest in the securities or derivatives of any entities referred to in this material. In addition, PFS Group may make purchases and/or sales as principal or agent. PFS Group accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of the use of all or any part of this material. Our comments are an expression of opinion. While we believe our statements to be true, they always depend on the reliability of our own credible sources. We recommend that you consult with a licensed, qualified investment advisor before making any investment decisions.
STORM WATCH UPDATE 4/26
Jim Puplava's Perspectives Just a reminder ...
... and don't forget ...
FSO Internet Radio Broadcast
Financial Sense Newshour
|
Home l Broadcast l WrapUp l Top 10 l Perspectives l Resource Center l Sitemap l About Us |
Copyright © 1997-2002 James J. Puplava Financial Sense? is a Registered Trademark
P. O. Box 1269 Poway, CA 92074 USA 858.486.3939
Please direct corrections and technical inquiries to webmaster@financialsense.com
I was watching NBR tonight. The guest was a total bear. He didn't like anything other than oil stocks and some defense industry stocks. His last comments were "Cash is King"
I'd like to share this little tidbit from todays report at www.comstockfunds.com - "Every day, it seems, we get more evidence that the so-called economic recovery is faltering. April employment was up 43,000, but the March number, originally reported as up 58,000, was revised downward to minus 21,000, a swing of 79,000. Similarly, the February figure, initially reported as plus 66,000, now stands at minus 4,000. With substantial downward revisions such as these, the current release showing a turn toward growth must be taken with a grain of salt."
Has anyone else noticed the fact that these unemployment numbers get announced with trumpets and fanfare when they are first released, and then when the revised numbers come out they are buried on page 47, under the ads for dry cleaning? Is anybody buying this anymore?
Anyway, I've been out of stocks for over a year now (except for some short positions) and I'm entirely in cash and real estate now (house is paid for). The big question is do I buy some gold now or wait a week or two for a possible momentary dip in prices? As far as this market is concerned, I'll go long again when P/E ratios matter again. The current multiples are just silly.
Someone here (I think it was Wyatt's Torch) predicted that those numbers were wrong and would be revised...
The Elliot Wave people claim gold will go to $250. I don't buy it. I'd get a position in gold now (I bought at $265) and add to it on the dips (if there are any).
The gold pros say that gold will move $25-$50 a day when the shorts positions blow up...
Could this be caused by the extension of unemployment "benefits" ? How many had exhausted theirs and have reapplied ?
billy_bob_bob: If you believe we are at the beginning of a major gold bull, I'd buy now. There is no guarantee there will be a dip.
If you are a gold speculator and intend to actively trade your position, hold off. Otherwise go ahead and buy now.
If it closes above $320 I'll jump in, and hold for a while. But I agree with the EWI guys and think in the short term it will go back down below $250. For a horizon of a year or more though, buying gold now is hardly a bad decision.
"The swell of bullishness toward gold has spilled into the mainstream. 'Gold's Got the Touch Again,' says The New York Times. 'Goldbugs Rejoice!' proclaims the Financial Times. 'Take a shine to gold,' urges a financial columnist. The 10-day Daily Sentiment Index of gold traders has pushed to 73.9% bulls, a level commensurate with previous market highs. One group that is not bullish on gold is the smart-money commercial hedgers, who now hold their largest net short position (-72,703 contracts) since the yellow metal was at $418 in February 1996 (-98,449 contracts.) So the smart-money has been selling into this rally. This should turn out to be a sound decision, as the Elliott wave pattern from the February 16 low ($253.50) retains a clearly corrective look. Wave (2) should be contained by resistance of $320-$325. Wave (3) down should carry gold below $250. The alternate count allows for a sharp spike to about $350."
It's the media coverage that tips the scales for me in favor of EWI.
The dollar wave count is much clearer to me, and points to at least one more rise before the dollar dies. While a rise in the dollar doesn't necessarily mean a drop in gold, it doesn't help the near-term gold bull argument. And ISI's liquidity index (M3 + commericial paper) has gone negative, which means actual deflation, not just disinflation.
The dollar is so important to the entire world, the players will not let it die that easily. There will be several massive efforts to prop it up before it dies.
* Nextel is drowning under $16.7 billion of debt, and has only $4.2 billion in cash on hand. Plus, the company has lost over $3 billion in the last 21 months alone.And there are many more examples just like these.
* PSINet, a leading provider of Internet backbone services, has $3.7 billion in debt, annual interest expenses of more than $398 million, and it doesn't even generate any cash!
* Maytag, Rite Aid, and Finova Group are just a few of the other American corporations that are up to their eyeballs in debt with little practical hope of repaying.
* Nextel is drowning under $16.7 billion of debt, and has only $4.2 billion in cash on hand. Plus, the company has lost over $3 billion in the last 21 months alone.And there are many more examples just like these.
* PSINet, a leading provider of Internet backbone services, has $3.7 billion in debt, annual interest expenses of more than $398 million, and it doesn't even generate any cash!
* Maytag, Rite Aid, and Finova Group are just a few of the other American corporations that are up to their eyeballs in debt with little practical hope of repaying.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.