Replies

It still intrigues me that those who campaign against the spread of AIDS, and against teen pregnancy just despise the one program that works for both; keeping the pants on! I'm not a "moralist" at all, and am for access to birth control pills, condoms and the like. But the acitivists; gezz - they say we can't tell 10yr olds to keep their pants on! Sick critters!

One would think they had stock in HIV drug research and abortion clinics. Hmmmmm; ok, not such a far-out theory now that I think of it. Most crack-pot groups do have a financial motivation behind them.

MARK A SITY
http://www.logic101.net/

They know what they're pushing....an agenda that weakens families and church, strengthens state authority. They also know that their "safe sex" anytime message is resulting in STDs (which often aren't stopped by a condom) in elementary school students who may not be able to ever have children, who are at an increased risk for cancers as adults....who will suffer emotionally, including higher suicide rates because they aren't emotionally mature enough to handle sex, the rejection, the possible resulting pregnancy, abortion.

If a corporation behaved so maliciously, and with foreknowledge to push a product that will hurt millions, they'd be put out of business. We need to hold the left accountable for the damage they're doing to families, to the children, to the world.

The feminists, the EU and this author are criminally negligent, imho. If we can't get them on contributing to the corruption of minors, we can at least send them letters....by the thousands, quietly, firmly stating the facts and calling the author on her lies.

By the way, the one country in Africa where aids is decreasing is Uganda...a nation with a Christian President who is stressing family values and abstenance...and the kids are listening. We have proof of what works, and what doesn't. This author is not only lying, she's pushing the agenda that has a proven track record of destruction.

they say we can't tell 10yr olds to keep their pants on! Sick critters!

You ain't seen nuttin yet.

"Sex ed" in this country means that you tell 10yr olds how to TAKE THE PANTS OFF AND DO IT!

I do not exaggerate.

It's really the last thing a 10year old wants to know, but it seems that launching curiosity at that age brings problems--such as chlamydia, the clap, syphilis, and, yes indeedy, AIDS.

One last thing: if Clinton and that bonzo Surgeon General he had think it's a GOOD thing--it's BAD. (So much for 'sex ed.')

If any one in the medical community disagrees with this statement please feel free to challenge it.

Pretend you are looking at a condom under a microscope. Now draw a 24-inch diameter circle on to a chalkboard. That is the size of a hole that is naturally occurring in a latex condom. Then with the point of the chalk make a dot inside that hole. The dot represents the size of a virus. If you drew a sperm cell it would be larger that the hole. Condoms were created to stop pregnancy not AIDS.