The rightmost column in the table is completely meaningless: there is no compounding here. If you were to look at cumulative values, build running totals as below:
Annual: | Cummulative: | |||||||
Proposed | Actual | % Difference | % Difference | |||||
1982 | 695.3 | 745.8 | 7.3% | 695.3 | 745.8 | 7.3% | ||
1983 | 773.3 | 808.4 | 4.5% | 1,468.6 | 1,554.2 | 5.8% | ||
1984 | 862.5 | 851.8 | -1.2% | 2,331.1 | 2,406.0 | 3.2% | ||
1985 | 940.3 | 946.4 | 0.6% | 3,271.4 | 3,352.4 | 2.5% | ||
1986 | 973.7 | 990.3 | 1.7% | 4,245.1 | 4,342.7 | 2.3% | ||
1987 | 994.0 | 1,003.9 | 1.0% | 5,239.1 | 5,346.6 | 2.1% | ||
1988 | 1,024.3 | 1,064.1 | 3.9% | 6,263.4 | 6,410.7 | 2.4% | ||
1989 | 1,094.2 | 1,144.2 | 4.6% | 7,357.6 | 7,554.9 | 2.7% | ||
Nothing to talk about.
Yes, Congress consistantly appropriated more than what was asked for.
But if more was appropriated in one year than what was asked for, why wasn't LESS requested the following year? If you follow the trend, it looks like they kept on trying to outbid each other, like in a poker game.
Nobody EVER came out and actually proposed a DECREASE.
I can still recall the bullcrap rhetoric that was fed to the taxpayers from both factions of the Republicrat Party:
"We decreased the rate of increase"
What a crock o' $hit!!!
"cut spending later"
What is an 'Oxymoron'?
Thanks to President Reagan the Cold War ended without total annihilation and the Russians are now our allies. And with all that, the American spirit soared again with the Gipper's optimism after the malaise of the Carter years.