You guys do know that you could pick any, and I do mean ANY group of people and you will be able to find some sicko losers that discredit that group. I don't agree with the lifestyle, but you are refering to an exception to the rule. Example. Presidents of the United States. By the logic that you are presenting in taking one extreme and judging the whole group, you have Washington, Adams, Lincoln, and Clinton. Therefore, I can write a book about Clinton and say that all presidents are cigar diddling, worthless, egotistical, sex freaks.
Is that true?
Want something more close to home and current? Clergy?
Oh no .. but a reply that has some qualifications in the real world would be nice ;). Can you ping me when your over 30 years young ? Thats presuming by that time you might have elevated your associations beyond the aol chat rooms .
Clinton and say that all presidents are cigar diddling, worthless, egotistical, sex freaks. Is that true? Want something more close to home and current? Clergy? The unmarried Catholic clergy are homosexual. Well not entirely true, but contrasted to the general population, They are disproportionately so.
mean ANY group of people and you will be able to find some sicko losers that discredit that groupUnfortunately that homosexual GROUP haas a much higher percentage of sickos, ect. than other groups. Or rather other groups with such large portions of screwballs attempt to isolate themselves from the culture at large whereas it is the goal of the publicly apparent homosexuals to make us all part of their weirdness.