Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-Aircraft Missile Launcher Discovered at Saudi Base Used by U.S. Planes
TBO.com ^

Posted on 05/10/2002 4:23:55 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

Anti-Aircraft Missile Launcher Discovered at Saudi Base Used by U.S. Planes By Matt Kelley Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Security guards at a Saudi Arabian air base used by U.S. planes found an empty tube from a shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missile this week, military officials said Friday.

Saudi security guards at Prince Sultan Air Base found the missile launcher about two miles from the nearest runway, said Rear Adm. Craig Quigley, a spokesman for U.S. Central Command. The spot was inside the base's outer perimeter fence and near an inner fence, Quigley said.

A cover on the front of the launch tube was intact, but there were scorch marks on the back of the tube, indicating it could have been used to fire or try to fire a missile, Quigley said. The 3-foot-long tube was for a Soviet-made SA-7 anti-aircraft missile.

The discovery has U.S. military officials puzzled and worried. No pilots reported seeing, hearing or detecting any missiles fired, and Quigley said he had no reports of any threats against the air base.

About 4,500 U.S. troops and an unspecified number of American warplanes use the base in the Saudi desert.

"Right now it's a mystery about what it all means, whether it was used or meant to be used," said Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Dave Lapan.

Someone firing an SA-7 from the spot where the tube was found could possibly have hit a plane taking off or landing at the air base, Quigley said.

"It's not an ideal spot to put yourself if you wanted to shoot down a plane. You could do better," Quigley said. "It's hard to know what to make of it."

Quigley said he did not know what day the Saudi forces found the missile tube. He said the Saudi forces photographed the tube and destroyed it.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: saudiarabia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
says enough..........
1 posted on 05/10/2002 4:23:55 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
sounds like it might be "booty time" for these lizard worshipping dirtbags.
2 posted on 05/10/2002 4:27:02 PM PDT by galt-jw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
The saudis "polite" request, that we leave because of our support for Israel's right to exist... not so subtle...

"We can turn you over to the dogs" is the message. Boy have WE got a message for them... soon, very soon.

3 posted on 05/10/2002 4:28:19 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
Bump for your statement more than the article!
4 posted on 05/10/2002 4:30:00 PM PDT by sleavelessinseattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I'm sure the Saudi's will get one of their best princes right on it and get to the bottom of this.
5 posted on 05/10/2002 4:31:51 PM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Quigley said he did not know what day the Saudi forces found the missile tube. He said the Saudi forces photographed the tube and destroyed it the evidence...
6 posted on 05/10/2002 4:33:38 PM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: galt-jw
They are not lizard worshipping dirtbags. Lizards actually exist.
7 posted on 05/10/2002 4:33:52 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: null and void
BTW, does anyone know how long you have to let fused sand cool down before you can land an airplane on it?
Just curious...
8 posted on 05/10/2002 4:35:53 PM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
good one.
9 posted on 05/10/2002 4:39:54 PM PDT by galt-jw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: null and void
From here to eternity?
10 posted on 05/10/2002 4:40:13 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: null and void
"BTW, does anyone know how long you have to let fused sand cool down before you can land an airplane on it? Just curious..."

Why land?

11 posted on 05/10/2002 4:41:55 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: galt-jw
Lizards? Is this DavidIcke territory? I say it is.
12 posted on 05/10/2002 4:42:33 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
Staging for the bigger job, maybe?
13 posted on 05/10/2002 4:43:11 PM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
Their eternity...
14 posted on 05/10/2002 4:43:40 PM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Well, the topology of the area around the dead sea would tend to contain the energy of the explosions, and in addition, the high concetrations of heavy metals in the soil would prolong the radioactive period. I would say it would be safe to occupy it within a year, so long as you do not spend a lot of time, and use a dust mask. It sure would solve a lot of problems!
15 posted on 05/10/2002 4:51:33 PM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The SA-7 GRAIL (Strela-2) man-portable, shoulder-fired, low-altitude SAM system is similar to the US Army REDEYE, with a high explsive warhead and passive infrared homing guidance. The HN-5 ( Hong Nu = Red Cherry ) is an improved Chinese version with upgraded capabilities. The SA-7 was the first generation of Soviet man portable surface-to-air missiles. Although classed as "fire and forget" types, the missiles were easily overcome by solar heat and, when used in hilly terrain, by heat from the ground.
16 posted on 05/10/2002 4:53:04 PM PDT by green team 1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: green team 1999
The SA-7 clearly is not up to US snuff. However, wouldn't it be effective for hitting jets as they land or take off? The planes are rather vulnerable as they are low, slow, and underpowered when landing.
17 posted on 05/10/2002 4:59:04 PM PDT by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Depends on whether you use a nuetron bomb or not.
18 posted on 05/10/2002 5:00:37 PM PDT by dts32041
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Hizbullah fires SA-7 missiles at Isaeli fighter jets
19 posted on 05/10/2002 5:02:57 PM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
I was thinking along the lines of a high air burst of a thermonuke, minimal fallout, enough heat at ground level to melt sand, not soaking everything in nasty neutrons...
20 posted on 05/10/2002 5:03:43 PM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson