Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnHuang2
There could be some benefit to the chips, on a volunteer basis. Maybe the chips could be used with pacemakers, to diagnose problems without having to go to the hospital, for example, or to jumpstart a stopped heart by remote control. But overall, I would never agree to any mandatory chip installation. If people want to put these things in their bodies, by all means go ahead.

The grey area I see is with children-- foolish parents will want to put a chip in their kids, so that they can track them down in cases of kidnapping, or to see if they are at the library or the arcade. This would be abusive in my view.

7 posted on 05/11/2002 12:10:41 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: monkeyshine
Have these morons never heard of ID bracelets? Put a chip in that, for crying out loud.

I can't wait for the lawsuits in ten years when these implants break, cause cancer, or react to some IV drug-users choice of 'stimulation'.

8 posted on 05/11/2002 12:34:45 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: monkeyshine
It may be voluntary today, BUT will it stay that way???????????
12 posted on 05/11/2002 12:41:14 PM PDT by GailA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: monkeyshine
"The grey area I see is with children"

It will become part of the standard procedures for newborns...after they get the apgar and blood work out of the way this will be a routine procedure. Initially they will ask for parental approval on some form but then state by state it will be mandated. Time to start pushing for legal exemption for religious or philosophical reasons NOW!
40 posted on 05/11/2002 4:53:55 PM PDT by Domestic Church
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson