Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/12/2002 8:52:07 AM PDT by Ordinary_American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ordinary_American
Your basic premise is incorrect.

They actually focused on the foreign angle, and possible connections to the 9/11 hijackers. far more in the first month or so of the investigation. That the possibility of foreign involvement has been "ignored" is incorrect. They switched to focusing on domestic after they were unable to turn up anything linking it to foreign activity or the 9/11 hijackers.

3 posted on 05/12/2002 10:34:47 AM PDT by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ordinary_American
The Weekly Standard ran a cover story, by David Tell, on this topic in their 29 April edition.


5 posted on 05/12/2002 9:37:03 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ordinary_American
While I have been following this story closely, there is some information in your post that is unfamiliar to me.

What is your source for the 200 Taliban trained in Northern Iraq and, in particular, their subsequent movements?

7 posted on 06/01/2002 9:49:13 AM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson